Fulton Judge Overturns Seven Election Rules, Declares Them Unconstitutional

In a decision that has sent shockwaves through Georgia’s political landscape, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas Cox struck down seven key election rules established by the Georgia State Election Board (SEB). The ruling, delivered just weeks before the 2024 election, nullifies several measures designed to enhance election security, citing them as “illegal, unconstitutional, and void.”

The SEB rules, which were put in place in response to concerns over election integrity, required measures such as hand-counting ballots, signature verification for absentee ballots, and video surveillance of ballot drop boxes. These rules were introduced to ensure transparency and security in the election process, particularly around absentee ballots. However, Judge Cox’s ruling has effectively dismantled these efforts, sparking controversy and raising concerns about the potential impact on the upcoming election.

The case was brought forward by Eternal Vigilance Action, Inc., a conservative group, along with two Republicans: former state representative Scot Turner and Chatham County election board member James Hall. The plaintiffs argued that the SEB had overstepped its legal authority by implementing rules that exceeded the boundaries set by Georgia’s Election Code. They contended that these rules not only violated state law but also created unnecessary barriers to the voting process.

Judge Cox agreed with the plaintiffs, ruling that the SEB lacked the authority to enforce these new rules. In his decision, Cox stated that the SEB rules were “unsupported by Georgia’s Election Code” and were in conflict with both the state and U.S. constitutions.

Keep reading

Iowa Poll Watcher Sounds Alarm on Illegal Aliens Being Allowed to Vote

An Iowa poll watcher took to social media Friday to sound the alarm about illegal aliens being able to vote in her state.

Laynie Marsh volunteered to be a poll watcher in county when she discovered that illegal aliens are in fact able to vote in the upcoming election.

“I feel like this is something I need to share with every US citizen — I signed up to work this November 5th election poll — The reason why I did this was because I wanted to see firsthand for myself if illegal immigrants are actually being allowed to vote. And I’m here to tell you that yes they are,” she said.

“This is what I’ve been instructed. When someone comes in to vote, obviously you ask for their driver’s license. That’s normal, that’s how it should be. You present that, it gets scanned, and then that information instantly goes into the computer, it pops up a screen. If you’re already registered to vote I will instantly see that.”

“You get a ballot and a concealed envelope. Then you’re prompted on where to go to fill your ballot out. After you finish filling the ballot out, it goes into that concealed envelope and it’s handed back to me. Then it is put into the [voting] machine,” she continued.

“Here’s the problem: illegal immigrants are being given driver’s licenses,” she said. “They are being given non-driving licenses. They look exactly like my license, or all of yours. Whatever state they have chosen to reside in, their license looks exactly the same as that state’s license that everyone possesses. There’s no way for me or anyone else working that day to tell if they’re an actual U.S. citizen from looking at that. And they’re being allowed to vote.”

Marsh went on to explain how the illegal aliens are given a provisional ballot that’s separated from normal ballots and vetted by an unknown poll worker using basic information that doesn’t prove citizenship.

Keep reading

Left-Wing Groups Using ‘Dystopian’ Tactics to Boost Voter Turnout: Rent, Gift Cards, Birth Control, Tampons

Democrat-aligned groups have been boosting voter turnout efforts through “downright dystopian” means such as free rent checks, gift cards, birth control, and “pole dancer” parties, sparking concerns over their efforts to attract young voters while raising questions about fairness as the DOJ focuses on Elon Musk’s America PAC over its recent sweepstakes.

As the 2024 election approaches, Democrat-affiliated groups continue deploying highly unconventional methods to boost voter turnout, particularly among younger voters in key swing states. 

From monetary incentives to street fests, these get-out-the-vote (GOTV) tactics are funded by shadowy networks of left-wing donors and nonprofits, in efforts pushing the boundaries of legal and ethical voter engagement and bordering on outright bribes.

In Philadelphia, for example, the nonprofit The Voter Project hosted a series of events offering $2,000 rent checks and free Target shopping sprees to participants who check their voter registration. The group has also distributed comic books and backpacks, targeting young voters in Democrat-heavy neighborhoods.

The tax-deductible nonprofit has even organized $10,000 grants to community groups as part of its effort to bolster early voting.

“We are registering tens of thousands of voters, signing up tens of thousands to vote by mail, and we are maximizing early vote,” boasted Kevin Mack, the group’s far-left strategist.

Keep reading

Texas voters stunned as ballots mysteriously switch presidential choices

Several voters in White Settlement, Texas, are raising alarm after experiencing an unsettling discrepancy during the 2024 presidential election. After voting for president on the electronic system and verifying their choice on the screen, many discovered that the printed paper ballot did not match their selection. One frustrated voter explained, “I voted for one president. I checked it on the video screen when I got the paper ballot, and it had the other candidate’s name on it. Check your ballots, everybody.”

This concern led to additional complaints from other voters. One man, who had to wait 45 minutes to cast his vote, reported overhearing two other people expressing their frustration about the machines changing their votes. While the problem seems to be isolated, it has raised concerns among some voters about the integrity of the electronic voting systems.

Keep reading

BOMBSHELL: Iranian Hackers Broke Into State’s Voter Roll Database – Used Names, SS and Driver’s License #’s to Fill Out UOCAVA Registrations – Shared Video of Their Actions Online!

On Monday, Jim Hoft, Editor and Publisher of The Gateway Pundit, and The Gateway Pundit Investigative Journalist Patty McMurray sat down with UOCAVA Expert and Professional Investigator Heather Honey.

** You can watch the interview here.

During our interview, we discussed the potential risks of allowing non-military, overseas voters to vote in our elections without having to prove their identity or even their citizenship in many cases.

Recently, the potential Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) crisis came to our attention when Democrats began telegraphing that overseas voters could be the key in 2024 to winning and perhaps even overturning the election results one week or more AFTER the election.

As reported earlier by Patty McMurray, the DNC’s stated goal of winning the votes of approximately 9 million Americans through its Democrats Abroad website seems impossible, given that according to a recent report by the federal government FVAP website, only 4.4 million US citizens reside overseas, and only 2.8 million of those are of voting age.

Reuters recently wrote about the DNC’s plan to spend $300,000 to register “9 million” UOCAVA voters leading up to the 2024 election. According to the government website FVAP, there are only 2.8 million eligible UOCAVA voters. Let’s assume that half of those eligible voters would vote Democrat (a generous assumption given the state of the US economy); that’s only 1.4 million eligible voters in the 2024 election. The 1.4 million number doesn’t account for how they would vote or even if they would vote, given that a meager number of eligible overseas voters actually vote.

Curiously, the DNC memo claims that “over 1.6 million Americans from the battleground states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin” live overseas, adding that they plan to “fight for every vote.”

Keep reading

Votes On Arkansas Medical Marijuana Expansion Measure Won’t Be Counted, State Supreme Court Rules

Arkansas voters will get to decide on a medical marijuana expansion initiative at the ballot next month—but those votes will no longer count following a new state Supreme Court ruling.

Prohibitionists who challenged the cannabis measure from Arkansans for Patient Access (APA) successfully convinced the court that the ballot title was affirmatively misleading, and justices ruled on Monday that votes will not be processed after Election Day.

The state’s highest court said it was siding the anti-marijuana group Protect Arkansas Kids (PAK), agreeing that the measure’s title is misleading because it fails to adequately explain that—beyond expanding the state’s medical marijuana program—it would also more broadly legalize possession of cannabis if a federal policy change is made and would also restrict the legislature from revising the voter-approved law if enacted.

“For these reasons, we hold that the proposed amendment is misleading,” Justice Shawn Womack wrote in the majoity opinion. “Accordingly, we grant the Intervenors’ request for relief and order that the Secretary be enjoined from canvassing or certifying any ballots cast for the proposed amendment at the November 5, 2024, general election.”

Keep reading

Voters in Georgia, Texas & Tennessee Report Voting Machines Flipping Their Selections

Voters in Georgia, Texas and Tennessee are reporting on numerous voting machine irregularities that are flipping their vote choies.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga) first broke the issue on The Alex Jones Show on Friday, reporting that Dominion voting machines in Georgia are flipping voter selections in her district from Republican to Democrat.

“CHECK YOUR BALLOTS GEORGIA!  Reports from Whitfield County, GA that Dominion machines are flipping votes. This is exactly the kind of fraud we saw in 2020 and it cannot be tolerated. I will be working to investigate this issue and ensure the integrity of our elections in Georgia,” Greene posted on X along with the interview.

Greene explained that a voter in Whitfield County noticed that their printed ballot didn’t reflect the selections they made on the voting machine.

“This voter’s printed ballot had been changed from their selections made on the machine. Good thing they checked their paper ballot before turning it in! After several attempts of trying to change it to reflect their correct choices, they had to void the ballot and use a different machine,” Greene posted on X.

Whitfield County Board of Elections later released a statement assuring voters that the voting machine irregularity “was quickly resolved.”

Keep reading

Shocking Actuarial Analysis Shows that Bloated Voter Rolls Hide Impossible Voter Turnouts of Over 100%

This actuarial analysis outlines misleading voter turnouts caused by bloated voter rolls.

It is well established that the Virginia Registration List (“VRL”) is materially overinflated. Recent estimates suggest that the list may include more than 1 million false registrations (excluding inactive registrations).

What may be underappreciated is that the high number of false registrations on the voter rolls materially distorts reported voter turnout statistics.

This mathematical demonstration shows how false registrations make turnout statistics unreliable, and facilitates an opportunity to hide election fraud. To illustrate this problem, Virginia’s Henrico County 2020 Presidential reported turnout statistics are used.

Facts:

US Census estimates based on actual surveys for the ratio of the number of registrants on the rolls to the citizen voting-age population nationwide for the last six general elections are presented below. Note that the highest ratio was recorded in 2020, at 72.7%. Virginia’s ratio was between 75% and 76%.

Keep reading

America Vs The Machines

What if you walked out of a store, pressed your car’s remote key fob, and the engine of another car in the parking lot started instead? Or, worse, what if someone else came up, pressed a button, started your car and drove away? Some one stole your car by just pressing a button?!? Aren’t those fobs supposed to be configured for just YOUR car?

That is exactly how our votes are stolen – the encryption codes on the voting machines are insecure, and can be made to read anything (or, open any door, as in a keyfob). Your vote, as you marked your ballot, goes into the voting machine (tabulator), then is transferred from precinct to county to state. You always think that the choices you made are the ones that go on to be counted as part of the totals which eventually – IN A GENERAL ELECTION – go to Washington, DC, to be certified as final election results. If, however, the tabulator on which you cast your votes, was not encrypted securely, all bets are off, and anyone could have altered or discarded your vote at will

Most of us do not understand encryption keys and their crucial places in our lives.

Encryption is simply the science of using codes and ciphers to PROTECT messages., like the one your finger sends to your car to let you in, start the engine, honk the horn or whatever. When that encryption is correct, your car does what you tell it to, AND IT DOES NOT DO WHAT SOMEONE ELSE ASKS OF IT.

If there is no secure encryption to keep YOUR key fob connected to only YOUR CAR, you have big trouble. Your car could be stolen by anyone.

So it goes with your vote, cast on voting equipment which is not secured by the proper encryption codes.

The federal government began to get into our elections after the “hanging chad” debacle in 2000, where Florida’s punch card system didn’t produce clean holes in several thousand ballots. Many election experts believe that the 2000 confusion was created to move people towards voting by machines. There is a whole store behind this, which I am anxious to share with you, when I come up for air…

Whether intentional or accidental, voting machines became the future of elections.

Keep reading

Here We Go: Top Pennsylvania Election Official Says to Expect Several Days to Process and Count the Ballots Again This Year

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Al Schmidt told reporters to expect several days to process and count the ballots again this year.

Al Schmidt told the far left Washington Post that it will take days to decide the election in Pennsylvania.

Al Schmidt: “But, unlike most other states red and blue alike, we cannot begin our counties cannot begin processing mail-in ballots before seven AM on election morning. Plenty of other states again Republican states like Florida and others allow this process to begin in advance And what that means is in those states you know the male the male vote by around midnight on election night except for the ones that maybe came in that day or that evening. That’s not the case in Pennsylvania because the process cannot begin until seven AM on election morning. And it is acutely frustrating to have a technical problem with a technical solution that is nonpartisan nonpolitical does not benefit any candidate or any party and have Pennsylvania go through this in twenty twenty and that issue having not been addressed in the last four years by our legislature… Meaning that it can happen again.”

For the record, Al Schmidt is a Trump-hating RINO. He was chosen as Secretary of State by Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro.

Keep reading