Tag: vaccine injury

The SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein was Deliberately Engineered to Cause Clotting and more

I have previously mentioned that Ron Fouchier described 6 features of SARS-CoV-2 that looked engineered in the memorandum he wrote for Fauci to memorialize the famed Feb 1, 2020 phone call. Possibly there were 2 calls.

In an article I have posted at the end of this piece, Dr. Steven Quay goes further into the weeds on the 3 HIV gp120 peptide sequences that were highly suspected of being engineered. Two senior Indian scientists already discovered and published on this on January 31, 2020. Their famous paper was summarily retracted, allegedly by themselves but more likely by Fauci’s boys, in 48 hours, never to be heard from again. Soon thereafter, Nobel laureate and HIV discoverer Luc Montagnier said on French TV that the GP120 sequences were deliberately inserted into the genome by a highly skilled virologist. Shortly after that, Montagnier died suddenly at age 89.

Steven Quay recently published a preprint on this topic, and while Zenodo says it got published by a journal in December, I am having trouble finding the journal publication in either PubMed or Google Scholar. I made a pdf from the preprint site. The preprint uses the word “providence” twice to mean “provenance.” One paragraph is incomplete.

I am not competent to assess the fine details, but I note that another paper in Trends in Immunology, with the following title and abstract (the rest was behind a paywall) was published in October 2024. Perhaps we are getting closer to understanding the nasty neuropathology of COVID?

Keep reading

TURBO-CANCER, HEARTBREAK & TOXIC SPIKE. Lethal Risks from Covid mRNA Vaccines

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a widespread use of vaccines, whose adverse and/or unwanted effects have been deliberately ignored, and at best underestimated by those doctors who have amnesia have forgotten the oath of Hippocrates.

In this article we summarize the scientific evidence on adverse effects and how much have influenced in our lives the COVID vaccines, research carried out by doctors and researchers published in PEER REVIEW on international medical journals, and finding out whether or not these effects are significant.

Three different studies leading to one result.

Oncologist Gentilini: “Turbo-Cancer Alarm from Vaccines”

The first of these studies that we will observe, is that of Dr Patrizia Gentilini, an oncologist who for over 30 years worked in the oncology department in Forlì (Emilia-Romagna).
In a passage of his work, the former Chief of Oncology states:

“The use of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious diseases is unprecedented and many are still unknown in this regard, since it is not clear from which cells of the body, after inoculation, the protein Spike is produced, how much it is produced, how long and where it is distributed”.

So, the Spike protein could represent a danger to those who have accepted the vaccination requirement imposed by law.

Keep reading

Experts Raise Questions About SIDS After Study Shows Vaccinating Preterm Babies Greatly Increases Risk of Apnea

Hospitalized preterm infants had a 170% higher incidence of apnea within 48 hours of receiving their routine 2-month vaccinations compared to unvaccinated babies, according to the data in a new study.

The study, published Jan. 6 in JAMA Pediatrics, defined apnea “as a respiration pause greater than 20 seconds or a respiration pause greater than 15 seconds with associated bradycardia” — or low heart rate of less than 80 beats per minute.

Noting that preterm infants receive their routine vaccinations at the same time as full-term infants, the study sought to determine whether routine 2-month vaccinations resulted in an increased risk of apnea.

The authors concluded, “The similar number and duration of apneic events and lack of serious adverse events suggest that current vaccination recommendations for hospitalized preterm infants are appropriate.”

However, Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense, said the authors arrived at their conclusion “by ignoring the risks” evident in their own data.

“A premature infant experiencing apnea will likely have a longer neonatal intensive care unit stay, further exposing them to hospital-acquired infection,” Jablonowski said. “This is on top of the other risk factors for apnea like death, respiratory failure, long-term lung problems and failure to thrive.

In a Substack post, cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough suggested that “it is conceivable” that with seven vaccines at age 2 months and 16 vaccines at 12-15 months, “combination vaccination could be associated with significant unmonitored apneas, febrile seizures, or both resulting in sudden infant death syndrome [SIDS] at home.”

Biologist Christina Parks, Ph.D., an expert in how vaccines affect the immune system, told The Defender the study confirms “what previous studies on premature infants have shown — that vaccination induces cardiorespiratory stress that manifests as the slowing of heart rate (bradycardia) and respiration as well as the cessation of breathing (apnea) for brief periods of time.”

Parks said the fact that “the known risks have not been implicated as potential causes of SIDS is inexcusable at this point.”

Keep reading

8 Bombshell Findings In Florida’s Grand Jury Report On Big Pharma’s Covid Shots

On Tuesday, a Florida grand jury released its final report on potential “criminal or wrongful activity” regarding the creation and promotion of the Covid jabs.

Requested by Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., and authorized by the Florida Supreme Court in December 2022, the grand jury was tasked with looking into whether individuals and entities, “including, but not limited to, pharmaceutical manufacturers (and their executive officers) and other medical associations or organizations” possibly violated state law related to the development, clinical testing, and marketing of the mRNA shots. The jury previously released interim reports in February and May 2024, respectively, which undercut much of the pseudo-science pushed by government “experts” on subjects such as masking, lockdowns, and natural immunity.

Following its investigation, the grand jury ultimately declined to charge any individual or entity in the case after the jurors “did not find any statute that [they] believed would be an appropriate vehicle for a criminal indictment based on the facts” in its final report. The grand jury did, however, note that such a conclusion does not absolve entities of engaging in unethical behavior.

“We want to be abundantly clear that this does not mean we believe the actions of these sponsors were always appropriate, or that the statements they made turned out to be factually correct,” the report reads. “It just means that those actions and statements are not sufficient bases to support criminal prosecutions.”

Despite the lack of criminal charges, the jury did unearth numerous major findings in its report that shine a light on deceptive behavior and actions surrounding the development and promotion of the Covid shots. Here are some of the biggest takeaways from the analysis.

Keep reading

Pfizer’s secret documents reveal that their COVID vaccine actually made you 8.7% more likely to get COVID

Pfizer tested all participants in their Phase 3 trial for N-antibodies. The results were kept hidden from the public. It was only through court order that we finally know what the results were.

Do you think they would have kept this data secret from the public if it showed good news? Heck no!

The table showed that Pfizer only had around 50% protection if you just take the table at face value. But if you interpret the table correctly, it shows Pfizer had negative efficacy.

In this article, I’ll show you how to properly interpret that data and get the truth.

The method was first disclosed by Jikkyleaks on May 24, 2022.

I recently became aware of it after independently replicating his work. I believe his numbers are slightly off, so I’ll show you the proper calculation for the correct estimate of the case counts.

No doubt about it; those who took the shots were more likely to be infected by COVID by 8.7%.

There is just no other way to interpret the Pfizer data. It’s “gold standard” clinical trial data.

The overall counts are too small for the result to be statistically significant. But the FDA should NEVER be approving a vaccine where the primary endpoint efficacy (reducing cases vs. the unvaccinated group) is so small to be statistically insignificant.

In plain English, the best estimates are that there were actually more infections in the vaccine group than the placebo group. Whoops!

This is a major failing of the FDA to recognize this.

It won’t be long before Senator Ron Johnson brings this to their attention.

Keep reading

Over 160,000 Skin Issues Reported to V-Safe After COVID-19 Vaccination

When the COVID-19 vaccines rolled out, CDC provided a V-safe app where people could record their symptoms. The attorneys who represent ICAN sued CDC to release this data. The V-safe data revealed over 124,000 reports of rashes; 22,000 reports of hives; 11,000 reports of blisters; 3,000 reports of eczema; 2,500 reports of psoriasis; and 1,500 reports of lesions. Some examples in the vaccine recipients’ own words:

  • “Severe hives. Started the morning of 1/11 went to urgent care 1/12 at 3am. Raised and red hives. Started on thighs and arms. Eventually covered 90% of my body.”
  • “Bullous lesions on hands. Slow healing process. Had a biopsy of one of the lesions.”
  • “6 silver dollar sized psoriasis like patches on my chest and ive [sic] never had any skin issues in my life”
  • “Had very unusual rapid growing lesion, biopsy done 1/15/21. Suspecting autoimmune process. Requires topical and systemic pain meds.”
  • “Painful blisters on my hands, feet, wrists and elbows as well as in my nostril.”
  • “Ulcers on roof of mouth and down throat (not something that has ever happened to me before)”
  • “Rash all over, hive like bumps on palms of feet and hands, back, stomach, legs, arms, its every where [sic] and very itchy.”

Scientific literature includes many reports of cutaneous (skin) reactions after COVID-19 vaccination. Most skin reactions to drugs are considered to be a hypersensitive immune response involving mast cells, and the preferred treatment is to discontinue the drug.

Keep reading

A Young Child Died During Moderna Covid Vaccine Clinical Trial — Did FDA Know?

A preschool-aged child died of cardio-respiratory arrest after getting a COVID-19 booster in a Moderna clinical trial. However, Moderna didn’t reveal the death to the public and only recently reported it on a European regulatory agency database, Alex Berenson reported.

The death occurred in late 2022 or early 2023, Berenson said, when children under 5 who had already received Moderna’s original mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine in the trial’s main phase were offered the “1273.214” booster against an early Omicron variant.

Berenson, a former New York Times reporter who now reports on his Unreported Truths Substack, today said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has declined to tell him whether the U.S. agency knew that a child died during Moderna’s clinical trial.

The failure of the FDA to provide a straightforward answer about whether it knew that a young child in a Moderna clinical trial died from cardiac-respiratory arrest is “vitally important,” Berenson told The Defender.

“Of all the mistakes public health authorities made around COVID, their insistence on pressing mRNA vaccines on children was probably the worst,” Berenson said.

By the time the COVID-19 vaccines were available for kids, it was clear that children were at almost no risk of serious illness or death from COVID-19, he said. “The shots had significant side effects, so the only rationale for giving them shots — even theoretically — was to reduce transmission.”

Keep reading

British doctor has medical license revoked over warning of COVID shot dangers

British doctors continue to be removed from medical practice for warning patients of the dangers of the so-called mRNA COVID “vaccines.”

In December 2024, consultant psychiatrist Dr. Daniel Armstrong was struck off the medical register following his description of pharmaceutical companies as “evil.”

Armstrong had appeared in a video shared on BitChute in which he described the COVID regime and the attendant “vaccines” as part of a “deception on a grand scale” – saying the injections put people’s lives at risk. In the video, titled Navigating the Truth-Deception Duality, he said:

My message is clear to everyone: don’t take any more. You’ve a doctor here, he’s got his licence on the line – given it up. Don’t take any more of the injections. These guys are evil.

The tribunal which deprived Armstrong of his right to practice medicine concluded he was “highly likely in future to act so as to put patients at unwarranted risk of harm” – as the Daily Mail reported on January 2.

According to the minutes of the tribunal, an anonymous email alerted the General Medical Council to Armstrong’s video – which had been initially released on July 17, 2023.

The tribunal has found that Armstrong’s use of his medical credentials to warn the public of the dangers of the so-called vaccines is a violation of medical ethics, stating the physician had “undermined public health information and posed a serious risk to members of the public who may have placed reliance on his opinions.”

Keep reading

Did COVID Vaccines Cost More Lives Than They Saved? Public Deserves a Rigorous, Truthful Evaluation

“Do you think there would have been less deaths overall if we hadn’t had a vaccine?”

This question was posed to Dr. Aseem Malhotra by Steven Bartlett during an interview on Bartlett’s podcast “Diary of a CEO.” To which Malhotra responded simply “Yes.”

Full Fact, a fact-checking organization, has written a verdict on Malhotra’s answer, claiming: “False. There is clear evidence that the vaccines saved far more lives than they cost.”

Part I: The illusion of certainty — Deconstructing claims of vaccine efficacy

The assertion that “There is clear evidence” of COVID-19 vaccines’ benefits outweighing their harms” exemplifies a dangerous oversimplification of complex medical realities.

This claim, often propagated by fact-checkers and mainstream narratives, fails to acknowledge the fundamental limitations in our current understanding and the methodological flaws inherent in much of the existing research.

The missing gold standard: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

In evidence-based medicine, properly conducted RCTs measuring all-cause mortality are the gold standard for determining an intervention’s overall impact. For COVID-19 vaccines, no such trials have demonstrated an all-cause mortality benefit.

The original trials were not designed or powered to detect differences in all-cause mortality, and follow-up periods were too short to capture long-term effects. Without this crucial evidence, claims of clear benefit are premature at best and misleading at worst.

The pitfalls of observational studies

In the absence of robust RCT data, fact-checkers often turn to observational studies. However, these studies are fraught with potential biases that consistently overestimate benefits and underestimate harm:

Selection distortion: Healthy user bias and time-dependent effects inflate apparent vaccine benefits and mask potential harms due to inherent differences in vaccinated groups and changing study conditions.

Temporal misclassification: Survivorship bias and miscategorization of vaccination status in early post-injection periods artificially inflate efficacy estimates and underestimate potential harms.

Classification bias: Vaccine status classification errors occur in a single direction, with the vaccinated often misclassified as unvaccinated. This results in infections and harms in the vaccinated being misattributed to the unvaccinated group, overestimating benefits and underestimating harms.

Reporting bias: Systematic underreporting of adverse events following vaccination due to factors like lack of recognition, dismissal of potential vaccine-related causes, or fear of professional repercussions leads to underestimation of vaccine risks and overstates safety.

Publication bias: The preferential publication and promotion of studies showing positive vaccine effects, coupled with the suppression or non-publication of studies showing no effect or negative effects, skews the overall body of evidence and public perception.

Keep reading

Key senator says U.S. vaccine safety system failing, urges reforms to testing and liability

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who next month will begin overseeing the Senate’s most powerful investigative body, says the government’s vaccine safety system is no longer protecting Americans adequately because of conflicts of interest and lack of transparency, and he is vowing to work with the incoming Trump administration to press for sweeping reforms.

Those reforms could range from changing the vaccine liability protections of drug makers to taxpayer funding and other changes to insure the independence of safety testing, he told Just the News.

“The best solution for this is actually make these products safer, and do real science to determine whether there are certain conditions that make you more vulnerable,” Johnson said in a wide-ranging interview on the Just the News, No Noise television show.

Asked whether the current safety system led by the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was adequately protecting Americans, Johnson answered: “I would say absolutely not.”

Keep reading