Ukraine Attacks Russian Belgorod Region With U.S. Long-Range ATACMS, Drones

This evening, the Ukrainian military fired drones and long-range ATACMS missiles into the Belgorod region of Russia.

Drones overnight on Jan. 4 attacked Russia’s Avangard factory in Smolensk Oblast, which makes solid-fuel rocket motors, and missile transport and launch containers. Drones also reported in Bryansk, Smolensk, Belgorod and Pskov, and St. Petersburg airport was closed, reported accounts on X.

The Belgorod governor reported multiple explosions in civilian areas; Tsarizm cannot verify that information at this time. He declared no one was hurt.

The Russian government declared all projectiles were shot down but this cannot be confirmed.

Keep reading

White House To Approve Massive Weapons Sale to Israel

Before President Joe Biden leaves office, he will approve one more massive arms sale to Israel. The $8 billion sale of missiles and artillery shells comes as human rights groups have labeled Israel’s war in Gaza as a genocide.

Axios reported on Friday, “The State Department has notified Congress “informally” of an $8 billion proposed arms deal with Israel that will include munitions for fighter jets and attack helicopters as well as artillery shells.”

Author Barak Ravid did not define what it means to “informally” notify Congress of the sale or if it fulfills the White House’s requirement to notify Congress of arms deals.

The massive arms sale to Tel Aviv comes after Amnesty International declared Israel’s onslaught in Gaza a genocide. “Amnesty International’s research has found sufficient basis to conclude that Israel has committed and is continuing to commit genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, the organization said in a landmark new report published today,” the report released in early December explained.

Keep reading

“Peace Through Strength”: A Gateway to War?

Trump’s assertion that he could resolve the Ukraine-Russia conflict within 24 hours of assuming the presidency is emblematic of his characteristic hyperbole; however, it reflects the sentiments of an individual who has evidently grown weary of the ongoing war and the financial burdens associated with America’s participation. Achieving “peace through strength” does not necessarily mean “peace through war” – NATO and the EU’s fears of being abandoned by the US could easily spin out of control. The war in Ukraine has exacerbated the visibility of the work conducted covertly and sometimes illegally by the US and its allies’ intelligence agencies. It is the role of journalists to expose the underlying cause of these proxy wars and unnecessary suffering – if not, the “peace through war” rhetoric will gain ground and invade our screens for the years to come.

The Latin phrase “si vis pacem, para bellum,” which translates to “If you want peace, prepare for war,” originated in the fourth century. However, the underlying concept can be traced back to the second century, specifically to the Roman Emperor Hadrian, who is credited with the principle of achieving “peace through strength, or, if that fails, peace through intimidation.”

The expression “Peace through strength” conveys the notion that the military might serve as a means to maintain or restore peace. Various leaders have employed this phrase throughout history, including former US President Ronald Reagan during the 1980s. The principle is often linked to the practice of realpolitik, however, it has faced criticism; for instance, American historian Andrew Bacevich argues that the phrase can readily transform into the justification of “peace through war”, a concept that is all too familiar and that has filed our screens for years, with NATO pushing for more war in Ukraine to achieve leverage rather than peace or the ongoing slaughter of the Palestinians in Gaza so that Israel, a so-called beacon of democracy can have peace,  torturing and killing civilians while illegally expanding its territory.

Keep reading

Exposing Territorial Recruitment Centers In Ukraine – Human Trafficking To Support The War Effort

A man captured and sold to the war industry in Ukraine managed to make a short video inside one of many Territorial Recruitment Centers (TRCs) in Ukraine. These men are captured and sold to the military and rapidly shipped to the front lines. The police and the military, trying to avoid the fighting, capture others to fight in their place. Avoiding fighting is one motivation, and the other is profit-making. Some abductors make $2,000-$2,500 per day in human trafficking. The letters on the wall stand for Jesus Christ, and a letter was also found in the cellar talking about the targeting of the Christian population. Many Christians are conscientious objectors, as allowed by Ukrainian law, but the law is ignored because money can be made.

In this video, you can witness another attempt to abduct somebody; in this case, they managed to escape.

Occasionally, someone captured will die in the hands of the police. 

Keep reading

Is Biden Teeing Up an Iran War for Trump?

President Joe Biden has less than a month in office, but that might be enough time to leave a very big mess on President-elect Donald Trump’s desk. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan presented Biden with plans to bomb Iranian nuclear sites before the end of his term “in a meeting several weeks ago,” Axios reported on Thursday. A source told Axios that Biden’s inner circle believes that he has both “an imperative and an opportunity to strike” now.

The same day, former Biden administration official Richard Nephew published an essay in Foreign Affairs arguing that “the case against military action is not so neat” anymore and that the United States “may have little choice but to attack Iran—and soon.” Nephew had once been a harsh critic of Trump’s attempts to pressure and threaten Iran. Now, like many other Democrats, he seems to be shifting from a dove to a hawk.

The Biden camp is following a path trod by the first Trump administration. Throughout Trump’s last year in office, his own inner circle talked about “military action to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons if Trump were to lose the election,” The New Yorker reported. A week after he lost the election, Trump asked for military options, The New York Times confirmed. The final discussion happened exactly four years ago—on January 3, 2021—when Trump’s advisers agreed that it was “too late to hit them,” according to The New Yorker.

In other words, the president starting a war that close to the end of his term would be severely overstepping his mandate.

Keep reading

Accused Cybertruck Bomber Served the US Army IN Ukraine

Accused Cybertruck Bomber Matthew Livelsberger not only recruited fighters for Ukraine, it has been revealed that he also served the U.S. Army in Ukraine as well.

“Livelsberger served in the Green Berets, highly trained special forces who work to counter terrorism abroad and train partners,” the AP said Thursday evening. “He had served in the Army since 2006, rising through the ranks with a long career of overseas assignments, deploying twice to Afghanistan and serving in Ukraine, Tajikistan, Georgia and Congo, the Army said.”

It is still unclear the dates he was stationed within Ukraine. Alex Jones had previously revealed that U.S. armed forced were stationed in Ukraine back when it was still being denied in the mainstream media.

Interestingly, the second Donald Trump attempted assassin, Ryan Wesley Routh, worked with U.S. intelligence agencies to expand The American Foreign Legion in Ukraine.

Keep reading

Weaponising Water: Israel Assumes Control Over The Al-Mantara Dam In Syria

Israeli military forces have established fortified positions and developed advanced military infrastructure in various locations within the Quneitra countryside of Syria. Since December 24, these forces have achieved considerable control over the Al-Mantara Dam, a crucial water resource in the region, which could have significant repercussions for both Syria and its neighbouring country, Jordan.

The Al-Mantara Dam is not only a key water supply for Quneitra, but also for its adjacent rural areas, and the Daraa Governorate. Reports from the local population indicate that movement in and out of the occupied territories is severely restricted, with Israeli forces enforcing regulated schedules for civilian access.

This manoeuvre by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) bears a striking resemblance to a well-documented strategy previously employed by the Islamic State (IS) in Syria and Iraq, where IS utilized water resources to advance its military and political objectives by seizing control of major dams and reservoirs along the Euphrates and Tigris rivers as part of their territorial expansion.

Tobias von Lossow, a doctoral researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP Middle East and Africa Division,  authored a compelling study entitled “Water as Weapon: IS on the Euphrates and Tigris”. In this work, he explores the strategic significance of dams and reservoirs to the Islamic State (IS).

Keep reading

Why Congress Members Face a Lawsuit for Funding Israel’s War on Gaza

On the last day of 2024, the deputy general counsel for the House of Representatives formally accepted delivery of a civil summons for two congressmembers from Northern California. More than 600 constituents of Jared Huffman and Mike Thompson have signed on as plaintiffs in a class action accusing them of helping to arm the Israeli military in violation of “international and federal law that prohibits complicity in genocide.”

Whatever the outcome of the lawsuit, it conveys widespread anger and anguish about the ongoing civilian carnage in Gaza that taxpayers have continued to bankroll.

By a wide margin, most Americans favor an arms embargo on Israel while the Gaza war persists. But Huffman and Thompson voted to approve $26.38 billion in military aid for Israel last April, long after the nonstop horrors for civilians in Gaza were evident.

Back in February – two months before passage of the enormous military aid package – both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International found that, in the words of the lawsuit, “the Israeli government was systematically starving the people of Gaza through cutting off aid, water, and electricity, by bombing and military occupation, all underwritten by the provision of U.S. military aid and weapons.”

Keep reading

Will Warnings of A Nuclear War Go Unheeded?

On December 7th, former United Nations weapons inspector Scott Ritter hosted a panel entitled “No Nuclear War: A Call for Reason” at the National Press Club in the nation’s capital.

The three-part symposium brought together a range of anti-war speakers to address the growing threat of a nuclear confrontation between the United States and Russia. Trepidation over that increasingly likely scenario has only mounted following the reckless brinkmanship by the lame duck Biden administration in supplying long-range ATACMs (Army Tactical Missile Systems, pronounced “attack-’ems”) to Ukraine.

Not only do the precision-guided munitions give Kyiv the ability to strike deep within Russian territory, but the U.S.-made missiles must be launched with the help of Western personnel, something that will be interpreted by Moscow as an attack by NATO. While the live-streamed discussion was overshadowed by the earth-shattering news of the fall of Damascus to Western-backed jihadists, the catastrophic developments in the Middle East only made the apocalyptic theme more pertinent.

Participants in the forum included former Ohio congressman Dennis Kucinich, retired Army colonel and Washington insider-turned-critic Lawrence Wilkerson, Code Pink organizer Medea Benjamin, The Grayzone founder Max Blumenthal, his wife and fellow journalist Anya Parampil, Black Agenda Report editor Margaret Kimberley, broadcast host Wilmer Leon of (now defunct) Sputnik radio, political commentator Garland Nixon, author and human rights lawyer Dan Kovalik, MIT physicist Theodore Postol, and 25-year-old LaRouche Party agitator Jose Vega.

Keep reading

The curiously evolving relationship between Russia and the terrorist group that took control of Syria

Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (“HTS”) is a coalition of Sunni Islamist insurgent groups in northern Syria. It evolved from Jabhat al-Nusra which was al-Qaeda’s former branch in Syria. In an effort to appear moderate, HTS cut ties with al-Qaeda in 2016. Despite these efforts, HTS remains listed as a terrorist organisation due to its history and ongoing activities.

HTS is designated as a terrorist organisation by the US, Russia, Turkey, the United Kingdom and other states.  But since HTS took control of Syria at the end of last year, it seems Russia, along with other governments, is willing to consider removing HTS from the terrorist list, even though there is no evidence that HTS has changed its ways.

We don’t have any answers, only questions.  Questions such as: Was the takeover of Syria agreed upon between powerbrokers in Syria, including Russia and the United States, before HTS launched their offensive?  Were groups such as HTS used to give the appearance of a takeover while, in reality, it was a changing of the guard?  

Keep reading