Tag: pandemic

A preprint study published today and coauthored by Dr. Peter McCullough described how the Covid vaccination has a much greater risk of causing blood clots in the brain verses the Influenza vaccine.

“There is an alarming breach in the safety signal threshold concerning cerebral thrombosis AEs after COVID-19 vaccines compared to that of the influenza vaccines and even when compared to that of all other vaccines. An immediate global moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines is necessary with an absolute contraindication in women of reproductive age,” the study said in the ‘Conclusions’ section.

The study broke down the numbers involved, showing a massively greater number of blood clots in the brain verses the Flu shot.

“There are 5137 cerebral thromboembolism AEs reported in the 3 years (36 months) after COVID-19 vaccines compared to 52 AEs for the influenza vaccines over the past 34 years (408 months) and 282 AEs for all other vaccines (excluding COVID-19) over the past 34 years (408 months). The PRR’s are significant when comparing AEs by time from COVID-19 vaccines to that of the influenza vaccines (p < 0.0001) or to that of all other vaccines (p < 0.0001).” the study said in the ‘Results’ section. “Cerebral venous thromboembolism AEs are female predominant with a female/male odds ratio of 1.63 (95% confidence interval (1.52-1.74), p < 0.0001). Conversely, cerebral arterial thromboembolism has a nonsignificant male preponderance. Cerebral venous thromboembolism is far more common than cerebral arterial thromboembolism over 36 months with an odds ratio (OR) of 14.8 (95% confidence interval 14.0-15.5, p < 0.0001). Atrial fibrillation, the most common identifiable cause of cerebral arterial thromboembolism, occurs far more commonly after the COVID-19 as compared to all other vaccines with a PRR of 123 (95% CI 88.3-172, p < 0.0001).”

Keep reading

I am posting this as a separate Substack article because it speaks to my article from yesterday about spike protein binding estrogen receptors. It is exceedingly important to understand what is being said here: the classification of an SAE was pigeon-holed to exclude everything but hospitalization, disability/incapacity or death. I imagine they did this to try to mimic the VAERS definition of an SAE, but left out birth defect, life-threatening illness and emergency room visits.

Having said this, um, what about all the other things that are excluded as SAEs that perhaps involved hospitalization, but that didn’t get the hospital box checked? What about all the other AEFIs/AEs that are certainly serious but that don’t click any boxes?

The part of this report from Odessa Orlewicz that I want to focus on, however, are the comments she reports on that refer to the disparity between AEFIs reported for males and women.

Here is a reiteration of my hypothesis from yesterday’s article entitled: “Spike binds estrogen receptor and could alter collagenase gene expression”.

Since targeted delivery of the modified-spike-mRNA-LNP complex results in massive amounts of (intracellular) spike protein production, and spike protein binds to estrogen receptors, is it possible that this binding event prevents dimerization of ERs to subsequently down-regulate specific gene activity? And if so, is one of these genes collagenase? And if so, is this why we are seeing strange de novo connective tissue disorders and fibrosis in individuals post COVID-19 injection?

I will add another question to my list.

And if so, does this explain why females were/are sustaining more injuries (and reporting more) than males in the context of the COVID-19 shots?

Apparently, according to FOI-requested information from individuals and organizations in Canada now implicated in contracting SAE definitions to give the AEFI data the appearance of being innocuous (aka: you’ll only feel a slight pinch), there were 8.2 times more women sustaining injury from the COVID-19 shots than men. This is also mirrored in VAERS.

Keep reading

Even before the roll-out of the toxic injections starting late 2020, the amount of money spent on “health care” in the US was a staggering 4.5 trillion dollars each yar. It is now widely recognised that the US health care system is dominated by big pharma along with their co-dependent regulatory health agencies. The “health care” model is designed to cause and prolong sickness and suffering in order to administer ever more expensive “treatments” – costs of treatments do not go down – ever.

The aging process could be defined as the gradual reduction in the bodies ability to fight off diseases that cause chronic conditions. Poisoning the bodies immune system means lowering its ability to fight off disease.

A cynic might say that the C19 disease and prioritizing the injection of the experimental injections amongst the elderly was an intentional plot to remove the costs of “treating” the elderly for an extended time – the elderly who could not pay for life prolonging “treatments”- in exchange for a much larger volume of younger victims that had more earnings power to tap.

In the same way that the instigators of the scamdemic “estimated” the death toll on the population of countries if non-pharmaceutical interventions were not taken – such as shutting down economies, masking and the prevention of all preventable human contact –-  let’s conduct a “scenario” – a conspiracy hypothesis – on the likely escalation in health care costs about to hit the US like the tidal wave that hit Fukushima.

We already know that in the four calendar years of the scamdemic the extra deaths per 10,000 people increased by 16% for each year – resulting in an extra 2.25 million deaths in the US (not excess deaths, extra deaths based on rates of death per 10,000 population (the 10,000 number does not matter, it could be rates of death per 100 or million or whatever).

A bogus RT-PCR test and a classification of death with C19 present as a cause of death resulted I 1.2 million C19 deaths being recorded in the US. This number is likely to be overstated 20 times because of the false positives from the test. These deaths should have been attributed to other leading causes in 2020. Deaths attributed to leading causes from 2021 onwards should have been attributed to “deaths from C19 injections” – not all, but a significant majority.

But, whilst Congress ignored the deaths of millions of Americans and wallows in its petty party political bickering ahead of the November elections, the numbers suffering from “adverse events” of the experimental injections is fifteen to twenty times higher than the 2.25 million extra deaths over the four years or so of the scamdemic and the injections roll-out.- perhaps 45 million Americas are suffering from adverse events.

Keep reading