Tag: iran

The War against Iran may be temporarily suspended (perhaps only while ammunition stockpiles are renewed) but it is about more than stealing land and oil and destroying an entire civilisation – it’s also about killing hundreds of millions, particularly in Asia and Africa, and destroying the global economy. This is a half-hearted peace, a peace full of tension and uncertainty and guaranteed betrayal; a peace as fragile as an old man’s bones. In that it now controls the Strait of Hormuz, Iran is stronger. The blustering, bombastic Trump now has a reputation in the gutter and his skills as a negotiator have been exposed as worthless. The dollar‘s days as the reserve currency are numbered. China and the yuan are winners.

The obvious, overt aim of the unprovoked attack on Iran was, as with all recent wars, to grab land and commodities (especially oil). All recent wars have been at least partly about commodities (especially oil). Even Gaza has oil. And it seems clear that the designer war between Russia and Ukraine was devised to destroy productive land and oil. It is, in short, part of the depopulation plan.

Similarly, there are covert, unspoken purposes for the attack on Iran – which is another “designer” war.

The first aim is to kill a lot of people, as part of the depopulation plan, which is an essential part of the Great Reset and which is, indeed, the reason behind the absurd pseudoscientific manufactured nonsense known as global warming, about which I’ve been warning for many years.

Worldwide, 40% of crops are grown on land which requires irrigation powered by diesel. Without diesel, farmers cannot grow or harvest crops. Fishing boats are stuck in their harbours because they have no fuel. No fishing boats means no fish. Wheat is the biggest food crop in the world but grain drying requires energy, which isn’t available. There is, it seems, plenty of fuel for transporting troops and bombs, but little for producing food. There is energy galore for the servers required for AI, but none for farming and fishing.

Did the poikilothermic, psychopathic warmongers know all this before they started their criminal activities?

Of course they did! They are taking over the world and plan to run it and destroy it. The wars aren’t going to stop – they are part of the plan to take us into the Great Reset.

Energy shortages are being used as a weapon and the thousands dying in the Middle East are clearly just beginning of a major land and oil grab.

You almost certainly did NOT read in the mainstream coporate press that the shortage of oil and fertiliser, and the higher prices of energy and food, will mean that hunger in Asia and Africa will increase. The deaths there could quickly reach hundreds of millions. Around 700 million people were hungry and close to starving to death before the United States and Israel started their current unprovoked war in the Middle East. And countries struggling to catch up with the 21st century will be held back – as planned. (Where are the Black Lives Matter campaigners when they’re needed?)

All this was predictable.

Keep reading

Regardless of how the conflict between the United States and Iran formally concludes, its symbolism is already unmistakable. An ancient civilization, one of the oldest continuous states in human history, has emerged as the final obstacle to the project of American global dominance. That alone tells us something about the direction in which the world is moving.

For historians, the deeper meaning of the current Middle Eastern crisis lies in the confrontation between two powers at opposite ends of the historical spectrum. Iran is arguably the world’s oldest centralized state, with roots stretching back to around 530 BC. Since then, it has never ceased to exist as a unified political entity. That continuity is remarkable. Even Russia, the major Western European powers, India and China have all experienced fragmentation at various points in their histories.

The United States, by contrast, is among the youngest major nations – barely 250 years old. Its history is ten times shorter than that of Persia. In that sense, the present conflict pits antiquity against modernity, a civilization forged over millennia against a state that rose rapidly in a uniquely favorable historical moment.

In purely military terms, such comparisons mean little. The United States retains overwhelming destructive capacity. If it chose to do so, it could devastate Iran. This is, after all, the only country in history to have used nuclear weapons against civilian populations. That fact alone should temper any illusions about the limits of American power.

Yet the long-term significance of this confrontation lies elsewhere. It isn’t about whether Iran can defeat the United States in a conventional sense. It’s about whether the current international order, one shaped by American dominance, can continue to function as it has.

Keep reading