Tag: hillary clinton

Hillary Clinton Calls on Liberals to Ruin Memorial Day Gatherings by Bashing Trump to “Friends, Neighbors, Cookout Attendees”

“Boy, this burger is great, Roy! What’s your secret?”

“Tom, don’t you know Hillary Clinton says Trump’s new budget is going to increase food insecurity?”

“*&%$ it Roy! I just wanted to enjoy Memorial Day with friends. Shove your burger! C’mon Betty, we’re leaving!”

Rather than honoring the military men and women who gave their lives defending their fellow Americans’ right to live in freedom, two-time failed Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is calling on her supporters to bash President Donald Trump and his One Big Beautiful Bill that passed the House this week when they get together with friends and neighbors at Memorial Day gatherings this weekend:

I’m giving you a mission for this Memorial Day holiday weekend.

I want you to talk to two people—friends, neighbors, cookout attendees—about why Trump’s proposed budget would be a disaster for American kids.

We owe the next generation every chance, and this isn’t it.

How the Trump budget bill would impact kids. (It would be a disaster.)

* Drastically cut health care. 15 million Americans, including millions of children, could lose access through Medicaid cuts and ACA marketplace changes.
* Increase food insecurity. Nearly 11 million people—including 4 million kids—could lose SNAP food assistance.
* Make families poorer. The bill would kick 4.5 million American kids off the child tax credit.
* Leave AI dangers unchecked. The bill would freeze state-level AI regulation for 10 years, stripping states of the ability to protect kids from deep fakes, exploitation, and more.

Keep reading

White House: Bondi to Release Files on Alleged Clinton ‘Conspiracy’ Deaths

The White House has announced that Attorney General Pam Bondi is set to release files concerning deaths linked to the Clintons. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed Bondi’s commitment to this decision, highlighting her history of keeping promises. The announcement follows a recent video shared by Donald Trump on Truth Social, which delves into the “Clinton Body Count” conspiracy theory.

Trump’s video suggests that over 50 individuals tied to the Clintons have died under suspicious circumstances. While conspiracy theorists have long speculated on this topic, the claims remain largely unproven. Trump’s decision to share such inflammatory content raises questions, but his actions are often unpredictable.

The video even speculates that Hillary Clinton was involved in JFK Jr.’s plane crash, allegedly to clear her path to the New York Senate seat. While such claims might seem outlandish, the high number of deaths surrounding the Clintons raises eyebrows. Some of the deceased were reportedly poised to testify against the Clintons, which adds a layer of suspicion.

Psychology Today has noted that conspiracy theories often stem from cognitive biases, like confirmation bias. This means people tend to believe narratives that align with their existing beliefs. Given Trump’s longstanding disdain for the Clintons, it’s not surprising that he would entertain such theories.

A common factor in believing conspiracy theories is a deep mistrust of authorities. Trump, having faced significant scrutiny from the left, might find it easy to mistrust those in power. However, airing these accusations without concrete evidence can be problematic.

While Trump has every right to voice his opinions, making unsubstantiated claims during his presidency is contentious. If he presents solid evidence supporting his claims, the narrative could shift dramatically. Until then, the theory remains speculative.

In the realm of politics, distrust and skepticism are not uncommon. Trump’s supporters may see his actions as a brave challenge to a system they feel is biased. However, critics argue that such statements without proof are reckless.

The Clintons have been a focal point for various conspiracy theories over the years. This latest wave of allegations is just another chapter in a long history of speculation. The promised release of files by Attorney General Bondi might shed light on these mysterious deaths.

Keep reading

Ex-Air Force Aide Reveals Harsh Atmosphere in Clinton White House, Labeled Hillary Clinton as ‘Nazi Schoolmarm’

A former Air Force officer who once held one of the most critical jobs in the U.S. government is now speaking out about the chaos and fear that allegedly surrounded Hillary Clinton during her husband’s presidency — offering a rare, unfiltered glimpse behind closed doors.

Lt. Col. Buzz Patterson, who served as the Senior Military Aide to former President Bill Clinton from 1996 to 1998, said his time inside the White House was shaped less by the commander-in-chief and more by his wife’s commanding presence. 

Patterson, who carried the “nuclear football” during Clinton’s administration, described a toxic culture shaped by Hillary Clinton’s unpredictable and allegedly hostile behavior.

“When I first arrived to work in the White House, my predecessor warned me: ‘You can get away with pissing off Bill but if you make her mad, she’ll rip your heart out,’” Patterson wrote in a post on X.

 “I heeded those words. I did make him mad a few times, but I never really pissed her off. I knew the ramifications.”

According to Patterson, the military and White House staff went to great lengths to avoid even being seen by the then-first lady. 

“She instructed the senior staff, including me, that she didn’t want to be forced to encounter us,” he wrote.

“Many a time, I’d see mature, professional adults, working in the most important building in the world, scurrying into office doorways to escape Hillary’s line of sight.”

Patterson claimed the first lady earned a notorious nickname among staff: the “Nazi schoolmarm.” 

He added, “She was the Nazi schoolmarm and the rest of us were expected to hide as though we were kids in trouble.”

He also alleged that Hillary made efforts to restrict the presence of military uniforms in the White House, interpreting it as part of an agenda to diminish the visibility of the armed forces under the Clinton administration. 

“The Clintons are corrupt beyond words,” Patterson concluded in his final post.

Patterson’s online comments, which have amassed over five million views, painted a stark contrast in atmosphere depending on Hillary’s presence. 

“We used to say that when Hillary was gone, it was a frat party. When she was home, it was Schindler’s List,” he wrote.

He added that Clinton staffers and even military personnel viewed the administration as deeply unprofessional.

“Among the military who served in the White House and the professional White House staff, the Clinton administration was infamously known for its lack of professionalism and courtesy, though few ever spoke about it,” Patterson noted.

“But when it came to rudeness, it was Hillary Clinton who was the most feared person in the administration. She set the tone.”

When asked by an X user what had caused friction between him and the former president, Patterson shared an incident where he refused Clinton’s request to visit a restaurant because the location hadn’t been cleared by the Secret Service, per Trending Politics.

The president was reportedly furious — but Patterson said even that paled in comparison to the consequences of upsetting Hillary.

Now a vocal supporter of President Donald Trump, Patterson’s candid recollections offer a window into what he describes as the behind-the-scenes dysfunction of one of America’s most powerful political families.

Keep reading

Hillary Clinton blasts Vance, Musk for encouraging higher birthrates, says immigrants can do that instead

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Vice President JD Vance and Elon Musk are pushing America to boost its birthrate to “return to being a Christian nation.”

On May 1, Clinton spoke at the Newmark Civic Life Series in Manhattan at the 92nd Street Y, New York. She argued that there is a “very blatant effort to basically send a message, most exemplified by Vance and Musk, and others, that, you know, what we really need from you women are more children… and what that really means is ‘You should go back to doing what you were born to do, which is to produce more children.’”

Musk, who has fathered 10 children with three women, has repeatedly voiced his concerns about the threat posed by a declining population, often advocating for policies that encourage childbearing. 

Vance also encouraged building families during his speech at the March for Life in January, declaring, “I want more babies in the United States of America. I want more happy children in our country, and I want beautiful young men and women who are eager to welcome them into the world and eager to raise them.” 

Keep reading

Reporter Asks Karoline Leavitt About Clinton Suicides and Epstein’s Ties to Israeli Intelligence Agencies After Trump Posts Video Tying the Clintons to Multiple Alleged Suicides

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt received a somewhat explosive question during Monday’s press briefing when a Zero Hedge reporter highlighted the bizarre deaths of associates of former President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and “the most famous Clinton-related suicide.” 

Many who have been close to the Clinton family have allegedly died mysteriously or “committed suicide” over the years.

This includes deceased pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, with whom Bill Clinton partied on Epstein’s pedophile island. Clinton made at least 27 trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s private plane. Most of those flights were with underage girls.

The Gateway Pundit has reported on a complete list of Clinton associates who died mysteriously or committed suicide before their public testimony. The list contains nearly 50 names.

Keep reading

‘Deplorables’ Redux? Clinton Drops Another Bomb

Hillary Clinton launches another offensive against Republican women, apparently learning nothing from her ‘deplorables’ disaster.

Hillary Clinton is at it again, showcasing her elitist contempt for conservative women by branding them as “handmaidens to the patriarchy.” This remark, made during a recent interview with Margaret Hoover, echoes her infamous “basket of deplorables” comment that helped sink her 2016 presidential run. While praising renegade Republicans Lisa Murkowski and Liz Cheney, Clinton made it clear that conservative women who don’t align with her progressive vision are simply enabling men and the patriarchal system. Her comments reveal a persistent disdain for conservative values and a refusal to acknowledge that intelligent women can willingly embrace traditional principles.

Hillary’s New Deplorable Moment

During a May 1 discussion at The 92nd Street Y in New York, Hillary Clinton delivered what can only be described as “Deplorables 2.0” when asked about women in politics. Rather than offering thoughtful reflections on female leadership, Clinton couldn’t resist taking a swipe at her political opponents. Her exact words should send shivers down the spine of every conservative woman in America.

“Well, first of all, don’t be a handmaiden to the patriarchy, which kind of eliminates every woman on the other side of the aisle, except for very few.” – Hillary Clinton

This breathtaking condescension perfectly encapsulates the progressive elite’s view of conservative women. According to Clinton’s worldview, women who support traditional families, oppose abortion on demand, or believe in constitutional rights aren’t exercising independent thought – they’re just puppets of men. The utter arrogance of this position would be laughable if it weren’t so insulting to millions of intelligent, independent-minded American women who simply hold different values than Clinton.

The Clinton Strategy: Divide and Patronize

Clinton’s approach reveals a calculated political strategy that her ilk has been executing for years. By granting special exemptions to Republicans like Senator Lisa Murkowski and former Representative Liz Cheney, she attempts to create a false dichotomy: the “good” Republican women who oppose Trump and side with Democrats on key issues versus the “bad” ones who are merely “handmaidens to the patriarchy.” It’s the oldest trick in the progressive playbook – divide and conquer.

As if her condescension toward Republican women weren’t enough, Clinton doubled down by making it clear she sees certain women as worthy of leadership positions – specifically those who align with her ideology. When discussing women in political leadership, Clinton stated: “Look, first we have to get there, and it is, you know, obviously so much harder than it should be. So, you know, if a woman runs who I think would be a good president — as I thought Kamala Harris would be, and as I knew I would be — I will support that woman.”

The message couldn’t be clearer: only progressive women deserve support in their political ambitions. Conservative women need not apply. This partisan litmus test for which women deserve elevation exposes the hypocrisy at the heart of Clinton’s supposed feminism. It was never about elevating all women – just the ones who think like her.

Keep reading

HE WENT THERE: Trump Posts Video Compilation of Mysterious Deaths and ‘Suicides’ Linked to Hillary Clinton

President Trump went there!

Trump posted a video titled, “The Video Hillary Clinton Does Not Want You to See” that documented just some of the mysterious ‘suicides’ linked to the Clinton Crime family.

The video touched on the deaths of John F. Kennedy Jr., DNC staffer Seth Rich, Clinton White House Counsel Vince Foster, Clinton White House intern Mary Mahoney, and others connected to the Clintons.

In July 1999, Hillary Clinton’s senate rival and front-runner for NY senate seat John F. Kennedy Jr. died in a plane crash.

Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern who could have been a star witness at the Clinton impeachment trials. She was executed at a DC Starbucks in July 1997.

In July 1993, White House Counsel Vince Foster was found dead of an apparent ‘suicide’ in Fort Marcy Park off the George Washington Parkway in Virginia.

In 1998, James McDougal, a key witness for White House prosecutors and financial partners with Bill and Hillary Clinton that led to the Whitewater scandal, died of cardiac arrest at the Federal Correctional Facility in Fort Worth, Texas, just before he was supposed to testify.

In 2015, Clinton White House Executive Chef Walter Scheib died of an ‘accidental drowning’ after he went on a hike on a trail in Taos, New Mexico. Scheib’s body was found submerged “in a mountain drainage flowing with surface runoff.”

In July 2016, DNC staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed in DC while he was walking home from a bar. It is believed that Seth Rich was the source of the Hillary Clinton/ DNC leaked emails published by Wikileaks. The Clinton/DNC emails published by Wikileaks greatly damaged Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

In August 2016, Shawn Lucas, a Bernie Sanders supporter who sued the DNC for rigging the primary in favor of Hillary Clinton was found dead in his home.

Keep reading

Hillary Clinton Accuses Trump of Engaging in Quid Pro Quo Transaction Over Qatar’s Gift of Luxury Jet – Instantly Regrets It

She really tried to go there.

Hillary Clinton criticized President Trump over his decision to accept a Boeing 747 as a gift from the royal family of Qatar.

The jet is actually a gift to the Department of Defense and earlier this week Trump called Qatar’s offer a great gesture.

“I think it’s a great gesture from Qatar. Appreciate it very much. I would never be one to turn down that kind of an offer. I mean, I could be a stupid person and say, No, we don’t want a free, very expensive airplane. But it was, I thought it was a great gesture,” Trump said.

Hillary Clinton lashed out at President Trump and suggested he is engaging in a quid pro quo transaction.

“No one gives someone a $400 million dollar jet for free without expecting anything in return. Be serious,” Clinton said on Wednesday during Trump’s visit to Doha, Qatar

Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation took MILLIONS of dollars from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and other Middle Eastern countries in exchange for access to the US government.

Clinton engaged in a massive influence-peddling scheme while she was the head of the Department of State and used a private server to evade FOIA.

In fact, Clinton Foundation whistleblowers, Lawrence Doyle of DM Income Advisors and John Moynihan of JFM Associates, argued that according to their research, the Clinton Foundation was operating outside of its bounds as a 501c3 non-profit organization and instead operated exactly like the global fund in Geneva, Switzerland, by brokering money and pharmaceuticals.

Mr. Moynihan also stated that 60% of the donations going to the Clinton Foundation were used for “administration fees” which is a stark difference from the industry norm of 10-15% for admin fees.

And who could forget the Uranium One scandal involving the Clinton Foundation?

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton influenced the Obama Admin’s decision on the purchase of Uranium One.

Keep reading

Hillary May Have Unlocked Our Government’s Digital Door

Here’s something most people don’t realize: We didn’t have the type of system-wide, ultra-high-level, utterly catastrophic breaches of the federal government’s network security before a certain server going up in a certain Secretary of State’s bathroom in early 2009. It’s been astonishing to me over the years how nobody seems to have noted this or the timing. Well, it’s about time we did. We’ll do it here. We’ll have a look at how bad it’s been, but first, let’s recall what started it all.

Secretary Hillary Clinton’s server, which former FBI Director James Comey described as having “less security than Gmail,” resulted in a serious and protracted “scandal [which] revolve[d] around questions about classified information, the preservation of government records and the security of her email communication.”

Any one of those issues, whether the utter recklessness with top-level classified information, the outright theft of our public record, or the insanely dangerous vulnerability of it all to our enemies, would have been enough to banish any normal person to the back of beyond. However, being a (D), especially one named Clinton, has its privileges, as we all know all too well.

Let’s remember a fact too few do: Hillary declined a “.gov” email when she took the job at State. She made an affirmative choice not to have a government email at all.

It’s not simply that she had a .gov email and neglected to forward her State-related personal email to honor her obligations (which is allowed, with specific limitations). Oh no. She made a clear choice to simply not have one.

That’s an order of magnitude worse than simply being derelict. It shows consciousness of intent—frankly, criminal intent—to steal, or allow others to steal, our records. Our records. Her job belonged to us, not her.

So, when James Comey, in that infamous July 2016 press conference said there was “no” criminal intent, he was flat-out lying, and he damned well knew it. And anyone with even a passing familiarity with the above knew it and knows it to this day.

So now that we recall how grievous Hillary’s crimes were, what of hacks of important federal systems? Well, according to a May 2015 CNN story, which opens with a big picture of Mrs. Clinton and mentions her server in the first paragraph, the 2014-2015 State Department hack was the “worst ever.” When even CNN makes the connection between the two, that’s pretty bad.

Keep reading

Senators, Don’t Fall For Hillary Clinton’s Desperate Lies About The SAVE Act

Last week, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 22, the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which I proudly co-authored with my friend, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah. The SAVE Act passed the House on a bipartisan basis, an inconvenient fact for Democrat leaders’ chosen narrative attacking it. 

Perhaps the most absurd narrative peddled from the left, including twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, is that the SAVE Act will somehow disenfranchise married women, or anyone else who has changed his or her name, from voting in federal elections. 

Nothing could be further from the truth. The SAVE Act secures all Americans’ votes by ensuring noncitizens do not vote in federal elections, effectively canceling out the votes of citizens, including married women.

The SAVE Act, a common-sense proposal widely supported by the American people, simply amends the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) to require documentary proof of citizenship to register individuals to vote in federal elections.

Those opposed to the SAVE Act have hurled wild accusations against the bill, comparing it to a “poll tax” or “Jim Crow 2.0.” This is nothing new; virtually every state that has passed election integrity laws has faced backlash from left-wing Democrats decrying the measures as racist. This ignores the fact that, for example, in Georgia, voting increased after the state implemented voter integrity measures. 

The left loves nothing more than invoking tiresome rhetorical tactics involving race or sex to stir up controversy against common-sense proposals. But Clinton’s argument that the SAVE Act will disenfranchise married women is not grounded in reality, and here’s why.

First, married women who have changed their name and already registered to vote — millions, mind you — are utterly unaffected by the SAVE Act. The so-called “69 million married women” figure is a statistical sleight of hand meant to purposefully ignite fear and conveniently glosses over this critical fact. As my friend Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., rightly pointed out during the House floor debate, this is a non-issue for those women, rendering the panic-peddling not just misleading but outright false. 

Second, for individuals who have changed their name and already updated their documentary proof of citizenship to reflect this, no action is needed, and they can register to vote.

For the small fraction of individuals who have not updated their documentation to reflect a name change — though most do so quickly for general life purposes such as an I-9 form for employment, passport to travel, and Social Security card for taxes — the SAVE Act explicitly directs states to establish a process allowing them to register to vote despite a name discrepancy. The SAVE Act specifically left this to the states because name-change procedures are governed by state law, and the specific requirements, forms, fees, and processes can vary from state to state. 

No one will be unable to vote because of a name change.

Keep reading