Tag: vaccine injury

NewsGuard fact-checked me today, providing the opportunity to clarify questions about the Audenz vaccine and the extremely high mortality rate in its small trial.

The big guns, the Health Editor, approached me this afternoon. Happy to learn the presentation is getting attention.

Below is the email I received and below that is my detailed reply.

On Jul 3, 2024, at 1:26 PM, John Gregory <john.gregory@newsguardtech.com> wrote:

Dr. Nass, 

My name is John Gregory, health editor at NewsGuard. We’re a news organization that reports on and tracks online misinformation. 

I’m emailing in regards to your April 20, 2024, CHD video in which you cited the FDA package insert for the H5N1 vaccine Audenz, and said, “One in 200 people who got this vaccine in a clinical trial died,” and later added, “This is a dangerous vaccine for a nothing disease.”

Video of your remarks has begun circulating widely on social media platforms in the past two weeks, used as evidence for claims like “Dr. Meryl Nass: One of the approved Bird Flu quackccines, Audenz… had a death rate of 1 in 200 during clinical trials.” 

I noticed the screenshot included in your original video highlighted the sentence, ““Fatal SAEs [Serious Adverse Events] included 11 (0.5%) Audenz recipients and 1 (0.1%) placebo recipients,” even though the very next sentence said, ““No SAEs were assessed as being related to Audenz,” meaning that none of the reported serious adverse events – including deaths – that occurred among trial participants were caused by the vaccine.

You also did not mention that the FDA’s own statistical review of Audenz stated that, “No deaths occurred that were considered related to the vaccine,” and concluded, “No major statistical or safety issues have been identified” with the vaccine, or that the published results of the Audenz trial said:

None of the serious AEs or AEs of special interest reported by subjects who received aH5N1c were considered vaccine related. Two subjects in the placebo group reported a related AE of special interest (immune thrombocytopenic purpura and polymyalgia rheumatic); these events were also considered serious AEs. During the study, 12 (0.4%) subjects had serious AEs with a fatal outcome, none of which were attributed to the study treatment, and most (n = 11) occurred after Day 43 during the follow-up period in subjects ≥65 years with underlying severe comorbidities and multiple concomitant medications.

Is there any reason why you did not mention any of this countervailing information?

My deadline is 5pm eastern today, July 3. Thank you. 

— 

Best regards, 
John Gregory

john.gregory@newsguardtech.com

Office: ‪(312) 489-8676

More about NewsGuard criteria here.

Dear Mr. Gregory,

Since I provided a screenshot of the package insert of the Audenz licensed vaccine and repeated what it said, this can hardly be characterized as misinformation, which you claim to be investigating.  Since I included the next sentence in the presentation, it cannot even be construed as incomplete.

Had you been working on issues of vaccines for over 25 years as I have, you would have been aware that the sponsor (mfr) and FDA, who together craft the vaccine labels aka package inserts, ALWAYS assert that most or all of the deaths and serious adverse events occurring during a clinical trial were adjudged to be not due to the vaccine.  Had they judged otherwise, a license would probably not have been issued.  A license was issued for Audenz.

Later, when a vaccine is given to millions of people, not just a few hundred as in this case, one learns which side effects are IN FACT attributable to the vaccine.

For example, at least a hundred million Americans had received an mRNA COVID vaccine before it was determined to cause myocarditis, in late May of 2021 by FDA.

That is the reason why the raw data, which I presented, are important.  So that people have the information to judge for themselves what risks they may face when choosing vaccination.  In fact, clinical trials often exclude sick subjects, and drugs and vaccines almost invariably appear more safe and effective in clinical trial data than they do later, in the real world—a fact known to all medical researchers.

Why did I not mention material from an article?  Because I was referring to the Audenz label, which is the legal document that FDA attests is true, unlike published articles which are generally written by the vaccine sponsor and have a lesser degree of reliability.  In fact, the numbers in the article versus those in the label are not exactly the same.

Furthermore, if the US government was comfortable with the H5N1 Audenz vaccine, why did DHHS’ BARDA just place an order with Moderna for H5N8 mRNA vaccines, even though the avian flu circulating in the US is H5N1?  Even though it makes much more sense to match the neuraminidase portion of the vaccine to the circulating strain…  which is done every year when seasonal influenza vaccines are produced?

Finally, I invite you to take a look at the WHO data on deaths in humans worldwide from the H5N1 bird flu, which confirms it is a nothing disease in humans, having mutated to a different form than it once had.  The federal health agencies have monitored 9,000 farm workers and all they found were 4 mild cases of disease, no hospitalizations and no deaths in the US over the past several years.

Keep reading

Vaccine-induced sicknesses increase exponentially in infants with each additional vaccine

In the research article, “Adverse Outcomes Are Increased with Exposure to Added Combinations of Infant Vaccines,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) scientists reveal the sheer number of vaccine-induced diseases in infants and children increases exponentially– more than doubling– with every vaccine added.

The CDC has never performed safety studies on any of the combinations of vaccines it recommends on its CDC Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule.

In practice, except for the hepatitis B vaccine recommended in the first 24 hours of life, infants rarely receive a single vaccine. Most are administered in combination with other vaccines.

A two-month-old infant adhering to the CDC’s childhood immunization schedule will receive eight recommended vaccines at one time, in combination. The infant will receive an additional seven doses when four months old, and could receive eight vaccine doses again when six months old.

“Each additional vaccine more than doubles the number of diseases detected in the study,” said CHD Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker. “The article presents evidence of the risks that should be considered in personal and medical decision-making.”

The study looked at over 1.5 million infant vaccine combinations. The authors revealed that a total of 45 different diseases were diagnosed within the first 30 days after vaccination, including infection and developmental delays.

Respiratory disease was the most recurring condition, with acute and chronic bronchitis presenting as an elevated risk in five different vaccine combinations.

Keep reading

Covid Vaccine Injuries Go Mainstream in Australia

Propaganda narratives shift slowly over time to absorb aspects of undeniable reality, whilst minimising damage to the interests of those benefiting from the big lie.

First, the Covid vaccines were safe and effective, and we were set to experience a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Get vaccinated to protect your community!

Next, the shots were safe and effective, but with rare side-effects, mostly mild. Still, the benefits outweighed the risks. Get vaccinated to protect your healthcare system!

In the latest narrative update, experts say all the shots except AstraZeneca’s are safe and effective, and they admit that vaccine injuries can be life-ruining, though still very rare. But Covid is worse. Get vaccinated to protect against Long Covid!

In an ‘After Covid’ Spotlight special on commercial media channel 7NEWS over the weekend, a panel of experts reflected on Australia’s Covid response. Tellingly, vaccine safety (or rather, lack thereof) occupied 17 out of a total 53 minutes, more than a quarter of the airtime.

Keep reading

Lancet Autopsy Paper Finally Published After Being Censored

In 2023, The LANCET censored & CANCELLED a ground-breaking COVID-19 Vaccine Injury & Autopsy paper within 24 hours following over 100,000 downloads. It has just passed peer review & is now published

The rapid development of COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, has led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury, including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity.

This systematic review aims to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

“We found that 73.9 percent of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination,” said Dr. Wiliam Makis, a radiologist, oncologist, cancer researcher, and author of 100+ publications. The study examined 325 autopsy cases.

“Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death,”

This is a victory of SCIENCE over CENSORSHIP!!

As Makis outlines, Author Nicolas Hulscher’s Incredible perseverance first. They didn’t give up after LANCET pulled our paper within 24 hours after 100,000 downloads for no legitimate reason.

Big pharma put the squeeze on @TheLancet but surprisingly failed to stop us.

The paper was delayed by one year, and many deaths could have been prevented. This paper SHOULD be a game changer. Dr. Makis says that this is the most comprehensive medical report linking autopsies & sudden deaths to the COVID Vaccines.

Keep reading

Pfizer purchased companies that produce drugs to treat the same conditions caused by covid vaccines

In 2017 a former vice president of Pfizer blew the whistle and said that pharmaceutical companies intentionally design vaccines to keep the public in a state of illness to profit from the treatments of vaccine-induced illnesses. 

Pfizer’s acquisitions of other pharmaceutical companies since the rollout of its covid vaccine seem to indicate this is indeed the case.

In 2021, Pfizer’s acquisition of Arena Pharmaceuticals raised eyebrows. The purchase price seemed disproportionate to the market size of the drug they acquired – a drug that is a potential therapy for all kinds of immuno-inflammatory diseases, including inflammation of the heart.  As we know, myocarditis began to skyrocket after the rollout of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines.

In 2023, Pfizer purchased Seagen Pharmaceuticals, known for its cancer drugs.  Was this because of the connection between the mRNA injections and “turbo cancers”?

In 2022, Pfizer purchased Global Blood Therapeutics for its drug to treat sickle cell disease, again for an amount that seemed disproportionate to the profit the company could make off the drug considering how many people have the disease.  Does Pfizer know something we don’t? Will we see a blood cell disease epidemic as well?

Keep reading

All Cause Mortality Higher in the Covid-Vaccinated — Study

A study published Sunday detailed how individuals who received the Covid vaccine were more likely to die, while their booster dose did nothing to help them.

In order to view the full study one must download the PDF file.

“…those vaccinated with one or two doses who had significantly higher risks than the unvaccinated,” the study said in the ‘Conclusion’ section. “We found all-cause death risks to be even higher for those vaccinated with one and two doses compared to the unvaccinated and that the booster doses were ineffective. We also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3/4 doses.”

The researchers analyzed data from the Italian province of Pescara for their paper.

Interestingly, the researchers calculated the loss of life expectancy of those who were injected with the exotic gene therapy technology, or rather, how many days of life is lost on average per shot.

They used the ‘restricted mean survival time’ (RMST) and the ‘restricted mean time lost’ (RMTL) to articulate the data.

“…we calculated the RMST difference that represents the best index of “life expectancy” in those comparisons where the assumptions of the model were not met [12], and with the RMTL ratio that can approximate the HR in the absence of proportional hazard assumption [13]. The RMST difference represents the days of life lost by the vaccinated population compared to those of the unvaccinated one, while the RMTL ratio represents the percentage of life expectancy lost in the vaccinated population compared to in the unvaccinated one,” the study said in the ‘Discussion’ section. “The differences in RMSTs between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are significant for both the two-dose and the three-or-more-dose groups. They may appear irrelevant (in the order of a few days), but they refer to a limited period of time (739 days for those vaccinated with two doses and 579 days for those vaccinated with three or more doses). They could be compared with the entire life expectancy of an individual, which in the province of Pescara has an average value of 82.6 years [14] (corresponding to 30,149 days).”

Surprisingly, those vaccinated with two doses lost more time on this earth than those vaccinated with three or more doses, however that is likely due to the fact that those only vaccinated with two doses died before they had the opportunity to receive their third.

Keep reading

Lawyer breaks media silence on Ottawa Detective’s probe into sudden infant death increase

An Ottawa police detective is facing trial for allegations of misconduct after investigating a series of unusual sudden infant deaths in the region, in 2021 and 2022.

Detective Helen Grus, who was working at the time for the sexual assault and child abuse unit (SACA) for the Ottawa Police Service (OPS), is accused of unauthorized access of an internal database while researching a potential link between the novel COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and an uptick in sudden infant deaths after their roll out.

During her tribunal defence hearing in May of this year, Grus presented evidence of a roughly 97% fatality rate among unborn babies in Pfizer’s clinical trial data. This full disclosure could not be heard because Grus was interrupted and silenced by the hearing officer, retired superintendent Chris Renwick, who has no legal training.

The defence suspects that the police and the hearing officer are politically motivated to silence and prosecute Grus, disregarding potential criminality around this alarming trend affecting the most vulnerable population.

Grus’ lawyer, Bath-Sheba van den Berg, describes the unsettling incident as unlike anything she has witnessed in proceedings before.

“She’s sitting there in front of me, facing me,” details van den Berg, “and she’s stating simply that, 31 out of 32 [babies died]. And as she was stating that, the hearing officer lurched forward and said ‘stop.’”

Keep reading

1/200 chance of death in context of new bird flu injection – 5 times higher than placebo according to clinical trial

On June 26, 2024, Reuters wrote a piece announcing the looming threat of plans to offer preemptive bird flu injection to the people of Finland who work with animals.

It’s important that the people of the world understand something about the so-called AUDENZ™ (Influenza A (H5N1) Monovalent Vaccine, Adjuvanted), another product in clinical trials that will soon be offered to the public to fight ‘bird flu’.

Some details: It’s a 2-doser – 21 days apart. Anaphylaxis is counter-indicated and a precautionary warning pertaining to Guillain-Barré syndrome is listed in the prescribing information sheet.

Keep reading

Stroke Risk: COVID Shots 200 Times More Likely to Cause Blood Clots in Brain

The COVID-19 vaccines carry a much higher risk of blood clots in the brain compared with other vaccines, according to a new study by Dr. Peter McCullough and colleagues.

The researchers looked at reports in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from January 1990 through December 2023.

They counted the number of cerebral thromboembolism events — as in, blood clots of the brain’s veins or arteries — reported in people who received a COVID-19 shot compared with those who received a flu shot or other vaccines.

Blood clots that block blood flow to the brain account for roughly 87% of all strokes, according to the American Stroke Association, a division of the American Heart Association.

McCullough — a cardiologist with over 1,000 publications and over 685 citations in the National Library of Medicine — told The Defender the study showed “an unacceptable risk of catastrophic thrombotic injuries to the brain” in individuals who took one or more COVID-19 shots.

McCullough summarized the study’s results on Substack:

“Compared to influenza vaccines given over 34 years, COVID-19 vaccines in 36 months of use had over 1000-fold increased risk of most blood clot events, and compared to all vaccines combined administered over 34 years, this risk remained at over 200-times greater with COVID-19 vaccination.”

Prior research has suggested that the spike protein in both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 vaccine can cause serious blood clotting, McCullough and his co-authors noted in their report.

Blood clots in the brain are difficult to treat, McCullough told The Defender, and “oftentimes leave patients with devastating disabilities.”

“This and other sources of data,” he added, “support calls to remove all COVID-19 vaccines from public use.”

The study — co-authored with Claire Rogers, Dr. James Thorp and Kirstin Cosgrove — is under peer review and available online as a preprint.

Keep reading

Guillain-Barré Syndrome ‘More Common Than Expected’ in Early RSV Vaccine Trial

Reports of the nervous system disorder Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) were “more common than expected” in the older adult population who received the new vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). The data, reported by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), matched trial data reported earlier this year.1

GBS is a “polio-like” inflammatory autoimmune disorder in which a person’s immune system damages nerve cells, which can result in muscle weakness and paralysis of the face, respiratory system and limbs, including full body paralysis and can lead to death. GBS usually develops after an infection and symptoms include numbness and tingling, throbbing pain, heart rhythm problems, high blood pressure, slurred speech, difficulty swallowing and shortness of breath. Most people recover but, in some cases, the nerve damage is permanent.2

Current recommendations state that patients over the age of 60 should talk to their doctor to decide whether they should get the new RSV vaccine. Government officials still say that the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks and that they do not plan to change their recommendations.1

The most recent CDC report highlighted 28 cases of RSV vaccine-related GBS and all but one developed symptoms of GBS within 21 days after being vaccinated. Data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) revealed that there were 1.5 cases per one million in people who received GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) Arexvy RSV vaccine, and five cases per one million in people who received Pfizer’s Abrysvo RSV vaccine.

There were 18 reported deaths after RSV vaccinations that were attributed to “a variety of reasons,” two of which were associated with GBS. Other reported causes of death included severe respiratory illness and failure, cardiovascular events, hepatic encephalopathy, RSV infection, and sepsis, among others.3

Keep reading