Democrat Rep. Jasmine Crockett used her opening statement this week to deliver one of the most exaggerated, unfounded speeches Congress has heard in years.
Rather than focus on public safety, government accountability, or the crises facing American families, she launched into a rehearsed tirade accusing President Trump of running an “autocracy.”
It was political theater—packed with conspiracy, missing context, and completely detached from the reality of Trump’s presidency.
Crockett claimed that since January, President Trump has used “the full power of the federal government to attack Americans.”
But so far during Trump’s presidency, violent crime has fallen, immigration enforcement was restored after years of neglect, and agencies long criticized for politicization were finally forced to operate under clear, lawful boundaries.
Crockett ignored these facts because they undermine the narrative her party relies on: that accountability equals authoritarianism when Republicans are in charge.
Her next allegation—that Americans face “militaristic operations” in their homes and “reckless, illegal acts by rogue agents”—has no basis in any federal action under President Trump.
What the record shows is that Trump reestablished stable enforcement protocols, reversed dangerous sanctuary-city policies, and reinstated cooperation between federal and local agencies.
Meanwhile, the same Democrats yelling “autocracy” supported no-bail policies and police defunding efforts that caused homicide rates in major blue cities to surge.
Crockett also resurrected the long-debunked claim tying Trump to Jeffrey Epstein.
She ignored the fact that Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, cooperated with prosecutors, and appeared nowhere in the criminal evidence.
Clinton, on the other hand, flew on Epstein’s jet more than two dozen times. Crockett selectively referenced “Epstein files,” implying that Trump is hiding them, even though his administration supported their release and none contain evidence of wrongdoing by him.
It was an attempt to manufacture guilt where none exists.
Her attacks then shifted to internal government processes—routine contracting decisions, old allegations unrelated to Trump, and administrative disputes she framed as “organized crime.”
These claims collapsed under basic scrutiny.

You must be logged in to post a comment.