NIH official finally admits taxpayers funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan — after years of denials

It’s about time!

At long last, National Institutes of Health (NIH) principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak admitted to Congress Thursday that US taxpayers funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China in the months and years before the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Dr. Tabak,” asked Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, “did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through [Manhattan-based nonprofit] EcoHealth [Alliance]?”

“It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak answered. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”

The response comes after more than four years of evasions from federal public health officials — including Tabak himself and former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci — about the controversial research practice that modifies viruses to make them more infectious.

Keep reading

Marathon Runner Left Disabled By AstraZeneca Covid Jab Now Suing Company, But UK Taxpayers To Foot Bill

A 50-year-old UK man named Adrian Walker was left disabled after taking the AstraZeneca Covid shot, and now he’s part of a class-action lawsuit against the company.

This comes as the pharmaceutical giant takes its COVID-19 jab off the market worldwide due to health hazards.

However, even if the 51 people pursuing legal action against the company are successful in court, AstraZeneca will be financially off the hook as the UK government gave the company legal immunity during the pandemic.

Because of the government’s deal with AstraZeneca, and other Covid jab manufacturers, UK taxpayers will instead foot the bill.

Keep reading

Coronavirus Pandemic Select Subcommittee Moves Closer To The Covid-19 Origin Coverup To Protect Anthony Fauci

The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic sent a subpoena Wednesday to compel Dr. David Moreno to testify in a public congressional hearing on May 22 before Anthony Fauci’s scheduled public hearing on June 3. 

Just like the National Institute of Health (NIH) and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) officials, like Dr. Francis Collins and Dr. Anthony Fauci, wanted to create the narrative that vaccinations were the only answer to COVID-19 pandemic in order to lift the lockdowns, and worked overtime to not create vaccination hesitancy by pushing the false narrative that COVID-19 vaccinations were “safe and effective” for all, congressional investigators are slowly unraveling how many players also are working overtime to protect Anthony Fauci over the COVID-19 origins. It is of no surprise that Dr. Peter Daszak of EchoHealth Alliance is involved, as is his mentor, Dr. David Moreno, who was Fauci’s Senior Scientific Advisor at NIAID, who was put on administrative leave in 2023. 

Congressman Brad Wenstrup (R-OH), Chairman of the Select Subcommittee, lowered the boom Wednesday by sending the subpoena to Morens after the subcommittee uncovered evidence suggesting Morens intentionally obstructed the investigations into the origins of COVID-19.

In June 2023, Morens tried to avoid potential Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by using his personal email instead of his NIH email, a letter from Wenstrup reads. Lawmakers have been asking if documents have been destroyed.

After the subcommittee discovered Morens’ potential federal records violation, the NIH placed Morens on administrative leave.

In October 2023, Wenstrup announced a subpoena for NIH records related to Morens’ potential federal records violation. NIH conducted an internal investigation into Morens’ actions but did not share its findings with Capitol Hill.

In November 2023, EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak appeared for a transcribed interview and called Morens a “mentor.”

In December 2023, Morens was scheduled to appear for a transcribed interview. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) stepped in and prohibited Morens from answering any questions about the origins of COVID-19. 

Keep reading

Classified docs from State Dept. give more credence to Covid-19 Chinese lab leak

The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic recently reviewed classified State Department documents that credibly suggest Covid-19 originated from a lab related accident in Wuhan, China.

Many experts said this was the case from the start of the pandemic but were censored by the US government, media, and social media.

The lab and research at issue, controversial “gain of function” studies to develop new vaccines, were funded with US taxpayer money via Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

The documents also strongly convey that the Chinese Communist Party attempted to cover-up the lab leak and that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) maintains a relationship with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), according to the members of Congress.

Of course this is no surprise since it has long been known that all research in China is looked at with a civilian and a separate military purpose in mind.

Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) is requesting the State Department rapidly declassify this information and share it with the American people.

These documents were previously released in an unclassified and highly redacted Freedom of Information Act production, first obtained and reported on by US Right to Know — a nonprofit working to expose government failures that threaten public health.

Keep reading

Woman With Vaccine Injury in Clinical Trial Sues AstraZeneca

An American woman who suffered an injury from AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine sued the company on May 13, alleging the company breached a contract by not paying for the medical care she requires to deal with the injury.

“They left us no choice,” Brianne Dressen, a preschool teacher in Utah, told The Epoch Times in an email.

Ms. Dressen has paid tens of thousands of dollars to drugs to treat the nervous system disorder and other issues she’s experiencing, according to the complaint, filed in federal court in her home state.

Ms. Dressen chose to participate in AstraZeneca’s clinical trial in 2020 because she wanted to help the company develop its COVID-19 vaccine. The consent form she signed stated in part that AstraZeneca would “cover the costs of research injuries” and “pay the costs of medical treatment.”

“With these reassurances should something go wrong, Bri signed the form, rolled up her sleeve, and let the drug company inject the experimental product into her arm. Her mind was at peace, as Bri believed she was doing the right thing for her country, her students, and her family,” the suit states.

Ms. Dressen soon started experiencing problems, including blurred vision, tinnitus, and vomiting. She later became extremely sensitive to light and suffered spikes in her heart rate.

Keep reading

CDC forced to release V-safe data, which includes over 780,000 reports of adverse reactions to Covid-19 shot

Reports of Covid-19 shot-related health problems, which were collected and kept hidden by the U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for several years, have now been published and reveal serious immune and brain dysfunction symptoms, include heart inflammation and death. Information on about 780,000 reports of adverse events following Covid shots were gathered and stored in the CDC’s special V-safe monitoring system that enabled Covid shot recipients to report adverse events via a cell phone text message.

V-safe is a smart-phone based surveillance system that allows users to access web-based surveys monitoring Covid shot adverse events and report reaction symptoms via a text message to federal health officials.

In the weeks after getting a Covid shot, V-safe users receive daily text messages asking about their health status. The messages contain a link to V-safe that allows users to answer follow-up questions including a checkbox of 12 symptoms, as well as enter a description of adverse events in a text message of not more than 250 characters.

According to a Jan. 13, 2024 article in The Epoch Times, CDC officials have collected approximately 7.8 million text responses from Covid shot recipients through V-safe. 

Previously, the CDC denied the public access to the V-safe reports and instead reported studies alleging that the data collected showed the shot was safe.

V-safe data released in 2022 from another lawsuit shows that between eight to ten million people, or 25 percent of responders reported reactions to Covid shots that were serious enough to require them to miss school, work or other normal activities or required medical attention or a hospital visit.

Keep reading

Emails Reveal Fauci Ignored Early Reports Of Injuries Caused By COVID-19 Vaccine

Dr. Anthony Fauci knew COVID-19 vaccines were causing serious injuries within days of the vaccines’ rollout in December 2020, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD). However, he didn’t respond to emails from people who described their injuries and asked for help — and he didn’t warn the public.

The 300-page tranche of documents released on April 21 relates to correspondence between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and people who contacted the agency about adverse events they experienced after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.

CHD requested the documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in November 2022. On April 12, 2023, CHD sued the NIH to obtain the records after the NIH failed to respond to the FOIA request.

As part of an October 2023 settlement, the NIH agreed to produce up to 7,500 pages of documents at a rate of 300 per month.

Dr. Joel Wallskog is a Wisconsin orthopedic surgeon who stopped practicing medicine after being injured by Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. He told The Defender the documents prove public health officials, including Fauci, “were well aware of the avalanche of adverse events that were occurring early in 2021.”

“No communication was made about these adverse events to the public,” said Wallskog, now co-chairman of React19, a nonprofit representing vaccine injury victims. “This prevented the public from receiving informed consent.”

Wallskog said that while the emails “are heartbreaking,” Fauci “was too busy to respond to Americans pleading for help.”

Keep reading

Another Damning EU Vaccine Safety Report

Part 1 of my analysis of the Periodic Safety Update Report #3 (PSUR #3) for the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 mRNA vaccine, covering the 6-month period of 19 December 2021 through to 18 June 2022, focused on the disturbing pregnancy and lactation cases. Part 2 of the report focuses on the tragic child deaths. 

Firstly, a comparative look at the data in PSUR #3 revealed similar findings in 1st PSUR, apart from a significant 55% increase in the number of case reports and a 36% increase in the number of adverse events recorded. The following similarities were found in both sets of data: three times the number of cases were reported for women; the age group most affected was for 31-50-year-olds; one-third of all cases were classified as serious and a significantly high percentage of cases were classified with outcomes as either unknown or not recovered. 

An Overview of the Data

  • 508,351 cases (individuals) suffering from 1,597,673 adverse events
  • Three times the number of cases were reported for women than men
  • 1/3 of all cases were classified as serious
  • 3,280 deaths reported 
  • 60% of cases were reported with either outcome unknown or not recovered
  • 92% of cases did not have any comorbidities
  • Highest number of cases occurred in the 31-50 year age group
  • Germany had the highest recorded number of cases (22.5% of all reported worldwide 
  • cases)

Germany had the highest number of recorded cases, a total of 114,573, which accounted for 22.5% of all worldwide cases for that 6-month period. It is worth noting that from December 2020 through to June 2022, a staggering 323,684 individual reports of suspected Covid-19 vaccine side effects were received by The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, an Agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health. Yet, despite this large number, Karl Lauterbach, Germany’s Minister for Health, known for his pro-lockdown and pro-vaccine stance, made the unsubstantiated claim that the “vaccine was without side effects” in August 2021.

However, earlier this year, Lauterbach made a surprising U-turn in a TV interview, where he stated, “These unfortunate cases [of Covid-19 vaccine adverse effects] are heart-breaking and every victim is one too many…” Only recently, the first lawsuit against BioNTech was filed in Germany, by the law firm, Rogert and Ulbrich, with the plaintiff seeking damages due to an injury, allegedly caused by the German vaccine manufacturer’s mRNA product. 

Keep reading

Insurance Data Showing the U.S. Excess Death Crisis Slides Behind a $10,000 Paywall

The Society of Actuaries has put up a five-figure paywall for access to new reports on covid mortality that in the past have revealed shocking rates of above-normal, or “excess,” deaths. 

In a post on its website, the SOA—a national source of risk data for life insurers—said it will charge $10,000 for four updates of post-pandemic deaths through next February.  

“This new series of group life mortality quarterly reports and data are only available for purchase,” SOA communications manager, Michael Nowak, confirmed in an email. Previous reports—which showed young workers dying at far higher excess rates than senior citizens—are still available on the SOA website, he said, and new, less-technical ones will be released to the public at an unspecified time.

Some industry watchers suggested the non-profit society, whose members pays dues, may be trying to develop a new business model. But it also may be attempting to extract itself from the contentious and politically charged issue of excess deaths and, moreover, what is causing them.  

Nowak would not grant my request to interview an SOA official who recently told a trade publication that deaths in young insured adults in 2023 were still far above normal. “Very important information in our reports we’ve been studying,” the official told me before our communication was cut off.  

Moreover, in an email, Nowak included an advisory, writing, “Please know that the SOA Research Institute data and reports on COVID-19 mortality does not validate any claims made to suggest a causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and mortality.”   

I had not asked about such a relationship.

The society’s primary job is to help insurers set rates based on the likelihood of injury and death, an indisputably technical and costly task. But because it is considered an unbiased source of trend information, its reports have also helped define the pandemic toll on working-age, insured people. While SOA has the right to use its reports as it sees fit, their loss would be a blow to pandemic information.  

In six articles published in mainstream venues, Dr. Pierre Kory, president emeritus of FLCCC Alliance, and I have used Society of Actuaries findings to call attention to the unheralded problem of excess deaths in America. In the first nine months of 2023, 158,000 more Americans died than normal, fifty times the toll in the World Trade Center attacks and more than in every U.S. military conflict since the Vietnam War. 

Keep reading

Whistleblower Exposes Internal Email Suggesting Pfizer Offered “Separate and Distinct” COVID-19 Vaccines to Employees

A whistleblower from Pfizer has leaked an internal email indicating that the pharmaceutical giant offered a “separate and distinct” COVID-19 vaccine to employees at its Pearl River research site in Rockland County, New York, InfoWars reported.

The email, dated January 2021, reassures  Pfizer employees that the vaccine supply for this internal program would not affect the doses committed to national governments worldwide.

According to the leaked document, site-essential workers were identified to receive these exclusive vaccinations.

According to the whistleblower, there was a widespread belief among employees that they were receiving vaccines that were different from those distributed to the public.

“I know we employees at Pfizer were receiving different vaccines and/or placebos, and this was the word around my site when I worked there,” the whistleblower told Infowars.

Keep reading