Tag: chemtrails

First-Of-Its-Kind Federal Geoengineering Lawsuit Filed By The GeoFight

A first-of-its-kind federal lawsuit sets forth allegations by an atmospheric scientist that historical weather data was manipulated and destroyed in order to justify weather modification and geoengineering activities. The case, Mabie v. United States (Case No. 1:26-cv-00274-SBP), involves an amended complaint filed by a legal coalition known as The GeoFight.

The complaint challenges the reliability and integrity of long-standing weather datasets used over multiple decades, including during the Obama and Biden administrations, to model climate trends, support federal rulemaking, and justify large-scale environmental initiatives, including geoengineering and weather modification. It also adds claims against the University of Colorado, Boulder, alleging retaliation and violations of federal whistleblower protections.

At the center of the case is Justin Mabie, a former steward of critical historical weather datasets used by the United States government, the United Nations, and other global entities. He asserts that historical data was destroyed in order to create a narrative aligned with political objectives, but not based on science.

The lawsuit also alleges that companies have been permitted to enter U.S. airspace, with the knowledge of the U.S. government, and release particles and gases intended to influence solar radiation, while significant funding from U.S., foreign, and private entities has been directed toward developing methods to intervene in weather systems.

The complaint further details that Mabie reported concerns regarding data handling, record preservation, and access to sensitive systems to NOAA officials, military personnel, and university leadership, including issues involving potential foreign access to restricted infrastructure. Rather than being protected, Mabie was allegedly subjected to a sustained pattern of retaliation, including harassment and eventual termination by the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Recent federal budget decisions, including actions under President Donald J. Trump to reduce or eliminate funding associated with certain geoengineering-related initiatives, have prompted renewed scrutiny of the scope, oversight, and underlying basis of such programs.

Keep reading

The Unseen War: How Weather Weapons and Engineered Scarcity Are Being Used to Control Nations and People

Introduction: The Weaponization of Rain, From Tehran to Your Backyard

I believe we are witnessing the final, gasping breaths of an empire that has turned its most advanced technologies against the very elements of life. Warfare is no longer just kinetic — it is environmental, biological, and psychological, waged on multiple subtle fronts. The alleged case of the Pentagon using advanced radar installations to steer precipitation away from Iran, creating a crippling drought, is not merely an attack on an ‘enemy nation.’ It is a chilling blueprint for a global assault on human abundance and freedom. This is the template being applied everywhere.

This isn’t just about Iran. It’s about you. The same principles of engineered scarcity — denying rain, blocking sunlight, contaminating soil — are being deployed domestically to destroy self-reliance and breed dependence. When rain itself becomes a weapon, the most fundamental gift of nature is violated. What we see in Iran reveals the brutal lengths to which this power structure will go to control populations through deprivation. It’s a warning klaxon for the entire world.

The Iranian Blueprint: Drought as a Weapon of War

The core claim is terrifying: that advanced radar installations were used to deprive Iran of rainfall, pushing the nation toward a near-unhabitable crisis. I see this as a deliberate act of environmental warfare. The technology to manipulate weather is not speculative; it is documented and operational. As I have stated in previous discussions, the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) consists of hundreds of massive antennas that can function as one huge steerable antenna, capable of aiming millions of watts of extremely low frequency waves at a small patch of the atmosphere [1]. This concentrated energy can be ‘injected’ into an area and used to influence atmospheric conditions.

Why the sudden return of rains following the destruction of these installations is not a coincidence, but direct evidence of cause and effect. This reveals a terrifying new theater of war, where the environment itself becomes a battlefield. Author Elana Freeland describes how geoengineering is a profit-maker for disaster capitalists and a force-multiplier for the military, providing real full spectrum dominance not just of weather but of the entire biosphere [2]. The story of Iran’s drought shows the brutal lengths to which this power structure will go. It is a violation of the most fundamental gifts of nature, turning life-giving rain into a tool of subjugation.

The Globalist Playbook: Scarcity as a Tool for Control

My conviction is that the ultimate goal is not victory over a single nation, but control over all populations through engineered scarcity. The principle I see at work is simple and brutal: Abundance — free rain, sunlight, fertile soil — breeds independence. Scarcity breeds dependence and compliance. This is the core strategy of the globalist depopulation agenda. As I detailed previously, globalists are now shifting into their ‘kill phase’ of human extermination, openly abandoning previous strategies to hide their true intentions [3]. They talk about cutting off energy supplies and causing food shortages to starve people to death.

This explains domestic policies designed to destroy self-reliance. From outlawing rainwater collection to shutting down energy infrastructure under false climate narratives, the assault on abundance is systematic. Carbon dioxide is actually good for plants and is used in photosynthesis, yet the climate change narrative has been used to crush domestic energy production. The goal is to make you dependent on centralized systems for water, food, and energy — systems they control and can weaponize. This is not an isolated tactic; it’s part of a coordinated ‘pinch’ against humanity.

Keep reading

States Push Back Against Geoengineering and Cloud Seeding

As public concern grows over geoengineering, cloud seeding, and other forms of weather modification, several states have moved to prohibit or restrict these practices. Multiple states, including Arizona, Florida, Louisiana, and Tennessee, have considered or enacted measures to ban intentional atmospheric manipulation, while Nevada has moved in the opposite direction by appropriating taxpayer funds for continued cloud-seeding operations. Together, these actions highlight a growing conflict between constitutional self-government and an increasingly normalized push for weather intervention by government agencies, researchers, and global climate-regime advocates.

Cloud seeding and geoengineering are no longer fringe topics. According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), cloud seeding is an 80-year-old technology used to increase precipitation or suppress hail, most commonly by dispersing silver iodide into clouds. The GAO report noted that nine U.S. states are currently using cloud seeding, while 10 have banned or considered banning cloud seeding or weather modification in general. The same report acknowledged that estimates of added precipitation range from zero to 20 percent, but also admitted that research into the effectiveness of cloud seeding remains limited and that reliable information on benefits and effects is lacking.

A 2025 scientific dataset built from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather-modification reports showed that cloud seeding has been practiced in the United States since the 1940s, and 832 reported weather-modification projects from 2000 to 2025 were documented in publicly accessible records. That dataset found cloud-seeding activity concentrated heavily in western states, with silver iodide as the dominant agent and ground-based deployment the most common method. It also found that activity rebounded after 2021.

The history of weather modification is well documented. As The New American recently reported, Operation Popeye was a U.S. military cloud-seeding program during the Vietnam War from 1967 to 1972. The New American, also reported that NOAA has stated that cloud seeding is the only common weather-modification activity currently practiced in the United States, and federal law has long required reports on such activity. In other words, the debate is not about whether weather modification exists, but whether government should permit, fund, or normalize it.

Keep reading

CIA accused of ‘poisoning the sky’ with toxins as files expose secret weather control agenda

Once top-secret CIA files have detailed America’s plans to control the world by manipulating the weather. 

The documents, declassified in 2003, discussed the controversial topic of weather modification, the tactic of launching rockets or using planes to dump chemicals into the atmosphere that alter the climate and local storm systems. 

Although the resurfaced documents from 1965 did not mention the specific chemicals used in the experiments, they did discuss the need for more funding of the weather modification projects that would soon be used as a weapon of war.

In fact, the memos noted that federal funding for the secret program was set to be four times higher in 1967 – the same year the US began spraying toxins over Vietnam to cause floods and landslides.

One post on X claimed: ‘The CIA has been poisoning the sky and controlling the weather since 1965!’

The 18-page report was recently shared by conspiracy theorists, years after it was quietly placed into the CIA’s public archives, including a letter praising the classified operation from US President Lyndon B Johnson.

Johnson’s endorsement of the CIA’s weather modification project came just three years after he gave an ominous speech on the future of America and the work to create ‘weather satellites’ with the power to strengthen storms.

While giving the commencement address at Southwest Texas State University in May 1962, then-Vice President Johnson said: ‘He who controls the weather will control the world.’

Just 18 months after giving this speech advocating for the US to control the weather, LBJ became the 36th president and would oversee two infamous projects designed to manipulate the weather – Project Stormfury and Project Popeye. 

Following the speech, the records showed real government programs were already underway by 1965, such as Project Stormfury, which flew into hurricanes and seeded them with a freezing agent called silver iodide to try to weaken the storms by disrupting their inner structures. 

Johnson’s letter, which is among the 18-page CIA report, from September of that year specifically mentioned the project’s work in manipulating a recent hurricane near Florida, believed to be Hurricane Betsy, which made landfall in Louisiana as a major Category 4 storm.

By 1967, however, this work expanded to Project Popeye, which was used against enemy supply lines during the Vietnam War to artificially extend the country’s monsoon season.

Intelligence officials also noted they had the full support of Johnson, who was determined to beat the Soviet Union’s efforts to control the weather as global tensions escalated. 

The US government has maintained that weather modification has been used only to help weaken dangerous storms and induce rain in drought-stricken areas.

However, conspiracy theorists sharing the files have accused the CIA of using these projects to keep the world dependent on government by weaponizing storms, blocking sunlight and poisoning food supplies to intentionally make people sick.

Those allegations focus on so-called ‘chemtrails,’ the white streaks seen coming from high-flying jets on clear days, which appear to spread out and dissipate very slowly.

Keep reading

US Bill Aims To BAN Geoengineering

Last month, Congress introduced legislation that would impose a nationwide ban on geoengineering and atmospheric weather modification, criminalizing activities such as aerosol spraying, cloud seeding, solar radiation management, and other atmospheric interventions designed to alter weather or climate conditions.

The bill, H.R. 7452, titled the Air Quality Act, was introduced February 9 by U.S. Representative Greg Steube (R-FL) and referred to the House Committees on Energy and Commerce, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Science, Space, and Technology.

You can find your Representative here and voice your support for the bill.

If enacted, the legislation would prohibit the injection, release, emission, or dispersal of chemical or biological substances into the atmosphere to alter atmospheric behavior, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity, establishing criminal penalties for individuals or organizations involved in such activities.

The bill states: “Whoever… knowingly authorizes or conducts weather modification in the United States shall be subject to the penalties described.”

Violators could face criminal fines of up to $100,000 per violation, imprisonment for up to five years, or both, along with civil penalties of up to $10,000 imposed by federal regulators.

The legislation also specifies that each individual injection, release, emission, or dispersal would constitute a separate violation, potentially multiplying penalties for repeated operations.

Keep reading

O’Keefe Sneaks Into Davos: WEF Climate Insiders Brag About Weather Manipulation

Undercover journalist James O’Keefe has pierced the veil of Davos secrecy, disguising himself to infiltrate the World Economic Forum and record what the climate elite whisper when they assume no outsiders are listening.

O’Keefe captured raw admissions of radical interventions that threaten sovereignty and burden ordinary people under the banner of “saving the planet.”

In the undercover footage from the Post Hotel in Davos—a hub for WEF attendees—O’Keefe recorded climate executives openly discussing taboo topics long ridiculed by the mainstream. The video shows him in a blonde wig and sunglasses outside the venue before slipping inside to confront or record these insiders.

Key revelations from the post include climate executives spilling secrets about “Carbon Taxes,” weather modification, and chemtrails. A WEF climate elite who works with three-letter agencies and DARPA discusses hidden plans about “artificial rain.” The same figure boldly declares, “Black Rock is behind us!”

The insiders tie massive financial players like BlackRock directly to their agenda, suggesting corporate giants are pulling strings on policies that impose taxes and experimental tech on populations without real consent. Carbon taxes, of course, translate to higher costs for fuel, heating, and goods—hitting working-class families hardest while Davos jet-setters preach from luxury suites.

Davos remains a magnet for globalist maneuvering. Recent reports from the WEF gathering highlight ongoing pushes around climate finance, AI governance, and economic resets—often framed as collaborative but frequently criticized as top-down control.

BlackRock’s influence looms large, with CEO Larry Fink involved in elevating the forum’s role post-Klaus Schwab. While Trump-era policies have pushed back against such agendas in the U.S., the international crowd in Switzerland continues advancing measures that centralize power and wealth.

President Trump is set to deliver a special address at the WEF tomorrow, his first in-person appearance there in years, heading what organisers call the largest U.S. delegation ever. This comes amid his administration’s aggressive moves, including withdrawing from dozens of international organizations seen as wasteful or sovereignty-eroding.

Keep reading

He Says No Threat Exists, Then Tries to Block the Sun

Gates Tones Down the Scare Talk, Then Reaches for the Sky Controls

For years, Bill Gates pushed the idea that climate change ranks among the biggest challenges facing mankind. He wrote books about it and toured the world, urging nations to spend trillions on new energy systems. He stood with the crowd that warned of danger at every turn.

Then, without warning, he released a memo claiming that climate change won’t end humanity, calling for calm thinking and saying fear does more harm than good.

People who never bought into climate panic thought he had finally caught up with reality.

Afterwards, they watched him push the strangest idea yet: supporting research to dim the sun. Reports laid it out in detail, while describing his plan to scatter sunlight away from Earth.

What better way of describing a man who now downplays climate danger: funding a plan meant for a world on the verge of collapse.

Like Stephen Curry switching hands, it reads like someone who switched talking points without changing direction.

He Calms His Voice Yet Builds a Project Fit for Panic

“Stop panicking!” cries the man who panicked for years. He is claiming the world will adapt, while telling leaders to focus on fighting poverty and disease instead of chasing perfect temperature goals. A message that many people believe sounds reasonable.

Hidden behind that tone is an idea borrowed from a plot in a climate disaster movie. Solar geoengineering aims to weaken sunlight, an idea Gates has backed for nearly 20 years through scientists who want to spray particles into the sky to reflect the light. Gates supports research that many climate activists call reckless.

A strange picture emerges from his pivot: he’s telling people to relax while he pays for a project built for a world on fire.

As his words drift one way, while his money drifts the other, what path do you think people will follow?

Earth Needs Steady Light More Than It Needs Tech Experiments

Plants don’t vote, trees don’t care about debates, and algae in the ocean don’t follow climate politics. There’s one significant thing they share: they all need sunlight.

Algae alone produce a large share of the oxygen we breathe. That tiny life floating near the surface depends on a stable source of light to survive. Shade the planet, and algae shut down, breaking food chains, changing fish stocks, and sliding the weather balance out of whack. Heck, even a slight drop in sunlight worsens harvests, shifts rainfall, and hurts the poorest regions first.

Gates fixes software issues with updates, solving them in days, while mistakes with sunlight can last for generations, if we’re lucky.

His plan treats the Sun like a variable light switch he can dial back when he feels like it.

Keep reading

Chemtrails: Conspiracy Fact

“The greatest, most damaging form of human activity on the planet at this moment in time must be considered these operations: climate engineering.”

If you caught Tucker Carlson’s November 10 show, you heard Dane Wigington issue this warning without hyperbole.

Wigington is a solar energy contractor who founded GeoEngineering Watch after noticing a significant decline in solar energy uptake of photovoltaic cells near his home in California. Having researched the phenomenon for nearly three decades, he believes it stems from “solar obscuration” caused by large-scale weather manipulation by our government.

Popularly known as “chemtrails” or “contrails,” these white streaks across the sky, left by aircraft, are familiar to most Americans these days. Fact-checkers are quick to dismiss chemtrails as conspiracy theory and label Wigington and his ilk as charlatans scamming people with fear and misinformation. After all, who would ever believe mankind could manipulate weather?

Documented History

Such naysayers obviously never heard of Operation Popeye, a U.S. military weather-modification program that used cloud seeding to increase rainfall during the Vietnam War between 1967 and 1972.

U.S. President Lyndon Johnson had bragged about government’s geoengineering plans in a 1962 address at Southwest Texas State University. Speaking first of satellite telecommunication technology, he revealed that “it lays the predicate and foundation for the development of a weather satellite that will permit man to determine the world’s cloud layer and ultimately to control the weather.” The purpose of this invention he revealed in his next breath: “He who controls weather will control the world.”

Fast-forward 50 years to 2011, when then-Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused Western governments of stealing rain. “European countries are using special equipment to force clouds to dump” water on them, with little left for drought-plagued nations like his own. Western media scoffed, and they ridiculed and trashed the story.

They’ve treated U.S. Air Force whistleblower Kristen Meghan with equal disdain. She served as a bioenvironmental engineer for nine years and made it a personal mission to debunk “chemtrails.” What she found was that the technology was “actually coming right out of my office.” Last year she told a reporter with kla.tv: “There are multiple forms of weather modification…. They’re saying it’s combating climate change. Well, the climate change we need to be worried about is man-made climate engineering, also known as geoengineering.”

U.S. Government Confirmation

Indeed, visit the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) website, and you’ll read that the Weather Modification Reporting Act of 1972 mandates that “all persons intending to engage in weather modification activities in the United States are required to provide a report to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) at least 10 days prior to undertaking the activity.”

NOAA, in turn, claims that “cloud seeding is the only common weather modification activity currently practiced in the United States.”

The only common activity? So, it’s not the only one.

Keep reading

Geoengineering Is No Longer Just A Theory

Most people check the weather the way they check traffic or the time. Rain might mean rearranging plans or canceling a child’s T-ball game. A cold snap might simply mean pulling out a sweater or your favorite tweed jacket. Weather, for most people, is an inconvenience or a conversation starter. Because when you need water, you turn on a faucet. When you’re cold or hot, you adjust the thermostat. Weather becomes background noise rather than a force that shapes survival.

For farmers, weather is everything.

We don’t just look at the forecast. We live by it. We watch humidity, wind patterns, soil temperature, and cloud formation with the kind of attention most people reserve for financial markets or national security briefings. A few degrees of difference can determine whether a crop thrives or dies. We wait for moisture the way some people wait for medical news. Because one wrong call can erase months of work.

Earlier this year, the temperatures had been in the high 90s for weeks. Summer seemed to arrive early, and the weather service confidently projected warm, stable nights in the 50s. Based on that forecast, we continued preparing the greenhouses and tending the spring crops. Everything looked promising.

Then one Monday morning in late April, we woke up to ice. Not frost. Ice.

Our greenhouses weren’t sealed, because the forecast told us we were safe. The propane heaters inside are set to turn on automatically at 38 degrees, and they ran full force all night. By sunrise, we had burned through $5,000 in propane, and everything was still dead. Every spring tomato. Every cucumber. Tender annuals. Guavas, lemons, and young tropicals. Outside the greenhouse, brand-new kale and broccoli seedlings that had finally established themselves were frozen limp and useless.

There was no warning. Just loss.

That is what it means when a farmer mentions the weather. He isn’t complaining. He is praying that a single cold snap, drought, hailstorm, or unpredictable shift doesn’t take away his livelihood. We do everything we can, but the weather still decides what survives.

Which is why the cultural conversation around climate and weather is so interesting. We’ve been quick for years to talk about climate change. And I’ve always said: If we’re going to talk about climate change, we also have to talk about geoengineering. Because at this stage, it’s hard to know where one ends and the other begins. It’s hard to know whether the shifts we’re experiencing are natural, human-caused, manipulated, or some combination of all three. It’s even fair to ask whether climate change exists in the exact framework we’ve been presented—or whether geoengineering exists in the exact framework we’ve been told—or whether the lines have been blurred without transparency.

This was once considered wild conspiracy, the kind of thing people joked about with tinfoil hat references. Yet now it’s discussed openly. Amazon Prime hosts documentaries about it. Universities conduct research on it. Weather modification companies operate publicly in multiple states. Government agencies acknowledge it.

Today here in Kerr County, after heavy flooding, a CEO of a weather modification company made a point to assure the public that his cloud seeding was not responsible for the rainfall. I’m not claiming it was. But when someone feels compelled to explain themselves for something everyone swore didn’t exist 10 years ago, the conversation has already changed.

And that leads to a reasonable and necessary question:

What is the ripple effect?

Keep reading

Iran begins cloud-seeding operations as severe drought bites

The Iranian authorities have launched cloud-seeding operations to induce rainfall as the country 

faces its worst drought in decades, state media reported.

“Today, a cloud-seeding flight was conducted in the Urmia Lake basin for the first time in the current water year (which begins in September),” the official Irna news agency said late on Nov 15.

Urmia, in the north-west, is Iran’s largest lake, but has largely dried out and turned into a vast salt bed due to drought.

Irna added that further operations would be carried out in the provinces of East and West Azerbaijan.

Cloud seeding involves spraying particles such as silver iodide and salt into clouds from aircraft to trigger rain.

In 2024, Iran announced it had developed its own technology for the practice.

Keep reading