Today, the story broke about a Muslim rape gang ringleader, who was convicted of 30 child rapes, who “cannot be deported” despite being stripped of his British citizenship – thanks to a rule in the Immigration Act 1971. Instead, this child rapist will be let loose into the British community.
It’s not only legislation which is protecting the perpetrators and putting the community at risk.
Today, Rupert Lowe, a Member of Parliament (“MP”) for Restore Britain, revealed evidence of the protection the BBC affords Muslim rape gangs.
The BBC has not reported on the findings of the independent Rape Gang Inquiry because, the BBC says, “complex choices” have to be made for editorial and practical reasons.
You can read the BBC’s excuses HERE.
The following is a tweet posted by Mr. Lowe, commenting on the BBC’s explanation.
The BBC has issued an official explanation on why it has failed to cover our rape gang inquiry.
“Complex choices” are made for editorial and practical reasons. These choices “should not be taken as indicative of bias.” Their words.
But the BBC were very quick to cover malicious complaints against our inquiry, in an attempt to smear our efforts. They were then forced to later apologise for how they covered the story.
So, either the inquiry is worth reporting on, or it’s not. They can’t pick and choose.
We’re told “complex choices” are made, meaning that efforts to uncover the industrial rape of young girls is not near the top of list.
Let’s take a look at a few stories on the main BBC news page, right now…
- ‘Osaka pays ‘love and respect to Japan’ in Wimbledon kimono’
- ‘Why £15 durians are being sold at half price – or given away for free’
- ‘We had packed lunches every day for 10 years and retired at 40’
Are these stories more important than the rape gang inquiry? I think not.
You cannot hate the BBC enough. I expect no fair coverage from them; I’ve stopped expecting it. But the BBC is funded by the British people. Their continued suppression of our inquiry is a disgrace.
Hellbound and Down 