Tag: elections

It is maybe the most bizarre yet accepted part of the modern American political tradition that for some reason the United States stands almost completely alone in the “democratic world” in its inability to count all of its presidential votes in a single day. Many days pass, and certain states can take weeks or even months to count every vote cast.

This is because the United States has not implemented a system that enables it to count all the votes, even though every other country in the democratic world can. In the 2020 Democratic primary in California, they didn’t issue a final vote total until two and a half months after the day that voters went to cast their votes.

We are already being groomed not to anticipate any results or vote tallies being announced anytime close to election night. Here’s Politico last week:

In an interview with POLITICO Magazine at the News Corp. building in Midtown Manhattan, Mishkin said that he plans on calling the election as soon as he can, but that a protracted vote count means it may take a few days.

The race seems very, very close. It is dependent on a number of states, like Pennsylvania, that we believe are going to be reporting in a pattern similar to the way they have reported in the past. So I’d say, the over/under is Saturday. Which was when the call was made last time. Which is when Pennsylvania is likely to come in.

And another one, this time from CBS News:

Unlike many other states, Pennsylvania can only begin processing mail-in ballots on the morning of Election Day.

It took four days to call the election in Pennsylvania in 2020. As those days passed, leaving the 2020 election results hanging in the balance, all eyes were on the Pennsylvania Convention Center in Philadelphia. Police and protesters were outside while Schmidt and his fellow members of the Board of Elections oversaw the counting of a record 375,000 mail-in ballots, most of them from Democratic voters.

[Schmidt] has urged people to be patient with Pennsylvania.

But there is great doubt that the inability to have a final count on Election day is anything but deliberate. Independent journalist Glenn Greenwald offered an interesting take:

The country I know best after the United States or one of the countries I know best is Brazil, because of how closely I follow their politics and this is what happens in Brazil. Brazil is, to put it mildly, not known for being particularly bureaucratically efficient. It’s the anti-Germany, as I often think about it, it’s a country that has a great deal of difficulty – and I find it a charm – for anything to work efficiently. Yet, the way elections work is that they take place on a Sunday, not Tuesday, to ensure that the maximum number of people can vote and that work doesn’t interfere. Voting is mandatory. So, there’s a very pervasive culture that people do go and vote. They show an ID in order to vote even though Brazil has a well-known and notorious income inequality and it’s not just people who are 18 and over, but even 16 to 18 who can vote. Brazil is a little bit smaller than the United States in population but when you put all those things together of mandatory voting and a bigger voting bloc and having it be on Sunday, the number of votes ends up being roughly similar to how many votes have to be counted in the United States. And the way every single election works is that the polls open at 8 in the morning and close at 5 in the afternoon or 6 p.m. in the afternoon, depending on the particular state. And then by 9 or 10 at night, 10:30 p.m. or 11 p.m. at the absolute latest, the full complete vote count not just for the presidential race but for the governor races, for the state legislatures are all fully counted and certified. 

Some will say that it’s a population size issue, but if that’s truly the case, explain how Indonesia, a country with the largest voting population, can do it in a single day.

Keep reading

What if you walked out of a store, pressed your car’s remote key fob, and the engine of another car in the parking lot started instead? Or, worse, what if someone else came up, pressed a button, started your car and drove away? Some one stole your car by just pressing a button?!? Aren’t those fobs supposed to be configured for just YOUR car?

That is exactly how our votes are stolen – the encryption codes on the voting machines are insecure, and can be made to read anything (or, open any door, as in a keyfob). Your vote, as you marked your ballot, goes into the voting machine (tabulator), then is transferred from precinct to county to state. You always think that the choices you made are the ones that go on to be counted as part of the totals which eventually – IN A GENERAL ELECTION – go to Washington, DC, to be certified as final election results. If, however, the tabulator on which you cast your votes, was not encrypted securely, all bets are off, and anyone could have altered or discarded your vote at will

Most of us do not understand encryption keys and their crucial places in our lives.

Encryption is simply the science of using codes and ciphers to PROTECT messages., like the one your finger sends to your car to let you in, start the engine, honk the horn or whatever. When that encryption is correct, your car does what you tell it to, AND IT DOES NOT DO WHAT SOMEONE ELSE ASKS OF IT.

If there is no secure encryption to keep YOUR key fob connected to only YOUR CAR, you have big trouble. Your car could be stolen by anyone.

So it goes with your vote, cast on voting equipment which is not secured by the proper encryption codes.

The federal government began to get into our elections after the “hanging chad” debacle in 2000, where Florida’s punch card system didn’t produce clean holes in several thousand ballots. Many election experts believe that the 2000 confusion was created to move people towards voting by machines. There is a whole store behind this, which I am anxious to share with you, when I come up for air…

Whether intentional or accidental, voting machines became the future of elections.

Keep reading