Tag: causes of death

A study published Sunday detailed how individuals who received the Covid vaccine were more likely to die, while their booster dose did nothing to help them.

In order to view the full study one must download the PDF file.

“…those vaccinated with one or two doses who had significantly higher risks than the unvaccinated,” the study said in the ‘Conclusion’ section. “We found all-cause death risks to be even higher for those vaccinated with one and two doses compared to the unvaccinated and that the booster doses were ineffective. We also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3/4 doses.”

The researchers analyzed data from the Italian province of Pescara for their paper.

Interestingly, the researchers calculated the loss of life expectancy of those who were injected with the exotic gene therapy technology, or rather, how many days of life is lost on average per shot.

They used the ‘restricted mean survival time’ (RMST) and the ‘restricted mean time lost’ (RMTL) to articulate the data.

“…we calculated the RMST difference that represents the best index of “life expectancy” in those comparisons where the assumptions of the model were not met [12], and with the RMTL ratio that can approximate the HR in the absence of proportional hazard assumption [13]. The RMST difference represents the days of life lost by the vaccinated population compared to those of the unvaccinated one, while the RMTL ratio represents the percentage of life expectancy lost in the vaccinated population compared to in the unvaccinated one,” the study said in the ‘Discussion’ section. “The differences in RMSTs between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are significant for both the two-dose and the three-or-more-dose groups. They may appear irrelevant (in the order of a few days), but they refer to a limited period of time (739 days for those vaccinated with two doses and 579 days for those vaccinated with three or more doses). They could be compared with the entire life expectancy of an individual, which in the province of Pescara has an average value of 82.6 years [14] (corresponding to 30,149 days).”

Surprisingly, those vaccinated with two doses lost more time on this earth than those vaccinated with three or more doses, however that is likely due to the fact that those only vaccinated with two doses died before they had the opportunity to receive their third.

Keep reading

A recent preprint study which relies on extensive data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) paints a concerning picture of the neurological health landscape in the United States. The study, which focuses on those aged 15-44, reveals a disturbing increase in deaths from neurological diseases both as the primary cause and among multiple contributing factors.

This uptick in mortality rates, which is particularly significant among younger adults, could have profound implications for the nation’s public health policies, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Perhaps most concerning, the study found an increase in neurological complications following COVID-19 vaccinations, including conditions such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.

According to Phinance principal Ed Dowd, “The results show a clear break from the prior historical trend in death rates from neurological diseases.”

Keep reading

A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination.

The paper’s lead author, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, faced significant opposition in bringing these findings to light. After initially being downloaded over 100,000 times, The Lancet removed the paper within 24 hours, according to Dr. William Makis. 

According to The Daily Sceptic, the reason given at the time was, “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

The news outlet added:

“Without further detail from the Preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the methodology really has. A number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields so it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by the Covid mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the U.S. public health establishment wants to hear.”

In a post on X Friday, Dr. William Makis shared the exciting news.

Keep reading

Researchers from Ohio State University recently discovered that fully vaccinated patients who test positive for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) are much more likely to die than unvaccinated COVID patients.

Published in the journal Frontiers in Immunology, their study states that “Among COVID-19 patients, mortality rate was significantly higher among Vax vs. NVax patients (p=0.002).”

“While mortality rates were 36% (n=25) and 27% (n=15) for non-COVID-19 [non-vaccinated] and [vaccinated] patients, respectively, in COVID-19 patients mortality rates were 37% [for non-vaccinated patients] and 70% [for vaccinated patients].”

Simply put, getting injected for the Chinese Virus increases one’s risk of death from COVID by nearly double, this compared to a much lower mortality risk among those who protected their natural immunity by choosing not to get jabbed.

The researchers also noted that the “Charlson’s Comorbidity Index score (CCI) was also significantly higher among” people who got jabbed versus those who decided to forego the injections.

Keep reading

Dr. James Thorp is an obstetrician-gynaecologist with over 20 years of experience, Dr. Peter Breggin is a psychiatrist and the author of more than 20 medical and scientific texts, as well as popular books including his 2021 book ‘COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey’.  He publishes articles on a Substack page titled ‘Breggin Alerts! Exposing Global Predators’.

Their discussion with Brannon House from Worldview Tube began with the two different manufacturing processes that were used for the Pfizer covid vaccine.  What is being referred to as Process 1 was used to make the vaccine for trials before emergency use authorisation was given.  What is being referred to as Process 2 was the process used to make the vaccines administered to the public.

According to pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole, Process 1 was trialled on 40,000 trial participants and Process 2 was tested in only 252 people before it was given to billions of people who were told it was “safe and effective.”

This was confirmed in a criminal complaint filed in Switzerland in February 2024. The complaint stated: “The manufacturing process for the mRNA products actually administered (“manufacturing process 2” with plasmid DNA) differed fundamentally from the manufacturing process used for the products authorised by Swissmedic (“manufacturing process 1”).”

“It’s 100% true,” Dr. Thorpe told Howse. “[There were/are] completely two different processes … There was absolutely a bait and switch.  Not only with the production process but also with the precautions they gave to protect their participants in the phase 2/phase 3 trials.”

Dr. Thorpe is referring to the advice given to trial participants not to have intimate relations with someone who is not vaccinated because of the risk of shedding.  However, the public has not been warned of shedding risks either before, during or since the mass covid vaccine campaigns.

Keep reading

US Rep. Dr. Rich McCormick (R , GA) is far from perfect. He is misguided on many issues and has, like the rest of them, imbibed many of the kool-aid narratives.

But on the coercively imposed Covid protocols, he is superb. Here he is holding Anthony Fauci, in my considered opinion one of the major mass murders in human history, accountable.

I find it extraordinary that the American people fall for every orchestration the government and its whore media present to them. It is the gullibility of Americans that has enabled the government to define truth-tellers as conspiracy theorists.McCarthy, KenBest Price: $19.07Buy New $17.80(as of 06:52 UTC – Details)

For democracy to work, people have to be intelligent, informed, and committed to the defense of their rights. I don’t see any sign of this anywhere in the Western world. Insouciant populations allow governments, ruling elites, and the presstitutes to control the explanations. The truth can’t make you free when you are too indoctrinated to be able to recognize truth.

The America-hating Democrats, who especially hate white people and intend to replace them with unhindered mass immigration from the third world, gushed over Fauci, calling him a ‘hero’ and praised his efforts to replacing the doctor-patient relationship with coercion against “vaccine deniers.”

In contrast, US Rep. Brad Wenstrup (D, OH) told Fauci: “you oversaw one of the most invasive regimes of domestic policy the US has ever seen.”

The squirming Fauci was shut down when an audio clip was played in which Fauci said, “It’s been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated.” Getting fired for not being vaccinated made it difficult for people in their lives. This is what Fauci advocated. “Take the death shot or be fired.”

Keep reading