How many participants in v-safe had serious adverse events?

• This is the first analysis (that I am aware of) which properly categorizes the severity of outcomes in v-safe
  • Using the “Most Severe Outcome” for each registrant boils down the analysis to one unique value per registrant and makes it much easier to discuss v-safe outcomes
• The v-safe statistic that is usually cited by Dr Peter McCullough and ICAN folks is incorrect
  • However, the v-safe statistic cited by CDC, and parroted by the vaccine pushers, is even worse – it is wrong by an order of magnitude!
• ICAN sued the CDC to publish the v-safe free text entries (they initially refused, claiming the MedDRA codes were sufficient). This analysis also directly refutes Dr Dan “Debunk the Funk” Wilson’s video explaining why the ICAN lawsuit is a “scam”
  • Most v-safe events do not occur within the first 7 days, so limiting the analysis to the first week makes no sense at all
  • The “Other” category for Most Severe Outcome can only be properly analyzed by performing text analytics on the v-safe free text entries, while Dan Wilson thinks these entries are not important

Dr Peter McCullough seems to be having a hard time keeping his v-safe numbers straight.

Remember, these were the five choices provided in the v-safe app if someone checked the “Get care from a doctor or other healthcare professional” box.

Keep reading