By now you’ve hopefully read my report from the weekend about the alleged forced retraction of a Covid vaccine cancer-risk study (the ‘Jiang and Mei paper’) after it generated a huge amount of publicity.
The exposé has ignited a lot of discussion, including some posts I want to recommend to you…
The Jiang and Mei story is just one of many examples of papers showing Covid vaccine harms, which pass peer-review but are later retracted following an activist witch hunt. Examples that come to mind are Mark Skidmore’s paper estimating 290,000 Covid vaccine fatalities for 2021 in the US (Skidmore was eventually exonerated and his paper published in a different journal), and several papers by
Jessica Rose and colleagues showing various Covid vaccine harms.
We knew that activist pile-ons precipitated such retractions, but we couldn’t prove that they were the reason for the retractions… until the Jiang and Mei paper.
“This could be the first time that political pressure has been proven to have been exerted to force the retraction of a valid scientific paper of such significance,” says
Dr Ah Kahn Syed (Arkmedic) in a follow up post to mine.
Hellbound and Down 