The psychological operation called “Judeo-Christianity”
In recent Zionist delusions in the West, a narrative has come back into vogue, according to which Christianity is closely linked to, and in a sense indebted to, Judaism, since Jesus was born a Jew. Thus, at the beginning of the 20th century, the term “Judeo-Christianity” was coined, with accompanying adjectives.
Now, there is a problem: it is a propaganda term.
Historically and theologically, there is no cohesive “Judeo-Christian” tradition. It is a modern political invention, promoted especially after World War II and during the Cold War, to create the illusion of shared values between Christianity and Judaism, mainly to gain the unconditional support of the West for the State of Israel.
The term is a contradiction in theological terms. Christianity is based on the belief that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and the savior of humanity. Judaism explicitly rejects Jesus as the Messiah, considers him a false prophet, and, in many rabbinical texts, denigrates him harshly. Jewish deicide hatred led to the crucifixion of Christ.
These are mutually exclusive worldviews; they cannot both be accepted unless they are stripped of their fundamental doctrines.
The term has been used as a weapon for political loyalty, becoming popular especially in the United States—is this a coincidence?—as a way to align American Christians with the State of Israel.
Its real purpose? To forge emotional loyalty, blur boundaries, and ensure that Christians unconditionally support Israeli foreign policy under the illusion of shared values. Evangelicals have been particularly targeted, told that supporting Israel is a biblical duty, misrepresenting Genesis 12:3 out of context as referring to a modern state created in 1948, not to the spiritual descendants of Abraham, when, as already discussed, the State of Israel and the biblical Israelites are two very different things.
What some Judeo-Christian elites really say about Jesus
Let’s leave aside the filters of politeness and quote some of what Talmudic Judaism says about Jesus:
Sanhedrin 43a: Jesus was executed for practicing witchcraft and leading Israel astray. He is boiled in excrement for eternity.
Gittin 57a: Jesus is in hell, burning in boiling excrement.
Shabbat 104b and Yebamot 49b make veiled and vulgar references to Jesus and his mother.
These texts were so inflammatory that the Catholic Church banned them for centuries; Jews themselves modified and censored these passages in public editions to avoid negative reactions, but in uncensored versions and private studies, these passages still exist and are quoted. Yet Christians are told that this is a “shared tradition”?