Why does Washington find it hard to beat Iranian influence? According to the State Department, it’s because the U.S. doesn’t use “political violence” in Iraq, a country that the U.S. famously invaded and occupied in 2003.
“Iran uses levers of power that we refrain from using (political violence, bribery) and has economic and cultural relationships we cannot replicate,” says the State Department’s Iraq Familiarization Course slideshow from 2020 and 2021, which it just released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), along with several hundred pages of other training documents.
This message isn’t propaganda for public consumption; it is an internal statement of the State Department’s line. Part of mandatory training for employees stationed at the U.S. embassy and consulates in Iraq, the slideshow is a window into what the U.S. government tells itself about its role in the Middle East. The line that “we refrain from using political violence” is a sign that American leaders haven’t really internalized what a disaster the Iraq War was.
“A stable, sovereign, united Iraq is core to pursuing all our interests in Iraq,” the slideshow states. “Optimal approach: Highlight that Iraq’s path to stability is through a strong relationship with the U.S., not Iran.”
To be clear, the Iranian government has used violence and bribery to influence Iraq, fostering predominantly Shi’ite sectarian militias that run their own protection rackets and assassinate peaceful opponents.
But one of the largest acts of “political violence” in Iraq’s history was the U.S. invasion of 2003, when American troops invaded the country, toppled its government, and imposed a new one at gunpoint. (So much for Iraqi sovereignty.) The Iraq Body Count Project has documented at least 120,108 civilian deaths, some of which the U.S. Department of Defense tried to sweep under the rug, as a result of the war from 2003 to 2011.
Hellbound and Down 