‘Events, dear boy, events’. So said British prime minister Harold Macmillan on the fallibility of leaders due to unanticipated, uncontrollable factors. ‘Shit happens’, to use a slang version. But what if events are neither incidental nor – in some cases – real?
Topically, should we believe that Iran had a nuclear weapon base deep in a mountain that was destroyed by American bunker-busting bombs?
Coincidence and cock-up are not as credible or reliable as conspiracy in explaining what is happening in the world today. Critical thinkers are joining the dots, and seeing ulterior motives, false flags and stagecraft to serve the globalists’ agenda. People at the highest rungs of power are inverting reality.
We’re in Alice in Wonderland, and it’s a deliberate strategy of shock and awe in pursuit of a new world order
Here, I present a radical reformulation of events, motives and outcomes.In conventional logic, events (as reported on ‘the news’) are real, and conspiracy theories are contrived. This, I believe, has been turned on its head by the scriptwriters, so that it would be more accurate (at least as a tendency) to posit:
EVENTS are contrived
CONSPIRACIES are real
‘The news’ is a curated programme. Events are highlighted to become talking points, often with psychological framing to make people respond in a desired way (e.g. sympathy, horror). Covid-19 was perhaps the biggest behavioural psychology operation ever, most of its impact arising through mainstream media reporting. Now we have the spectre of World War Three, but is this an actual escalation to hot war, or another stage show?
Events are contrived at three levels. They may be real, unpredicted incidents, but exploited in some way (e.g. a racially prejudiced comment used as evidence of a racist society). At another level are events that are real but designed, with the true motives hidden. For example, we might suspect the Baltimore bridge being struck by a container ship, derailment of chemical freight at East Palestine in Ohio, food warehouse fires and other damage to infrastructure; also forest fires with a hint of arson). Finally there are events that are fabricated. The latter are the most controversial.
There are two audiences for contrived events. For the majority (‘normies’) the story on ‘the news’ is accepted at face value. These are easy minds to manipulate. Furthermore, the event may contribute to a problem-reaction-solution mechanism, often to advance technocratic surveillance.
Hellbound and Down 