For decades, the Out-of-Africa (OoA) model dominated narratives about modern human origins. According to this theory, Homo sapiens evolved exclusively in Africa around 200,000–300,000 years ago and later migrated out in a single wave approximately 60,000–70,000 years ago, replacing archaic human populations across Eurasia with little or no interbreeding. This narrative, elegant in its simplicity, has shaped textbooks, museum exhibits, and public understanding of human evolution for over half a century.
However, the accumulating evidence genetic, fossil, and archaeological no longer supports such a clean, linear model. While Africa remains a crucial part of the story, recent discoveries suggest that human evolution was neither geographically isolated nor genetically unidirectional. Instead, the emerging picture points to a complex, braided stream of evolution involving structured populations across Africa, Eurasia, and the Levant. This shift is not a mere refinement it is a foundational rethinking of what it means to trace human origins.
Genetic Diversity Is Not Proof of Geographic Origin
One of the central pillars supporting the Out-of-Africa model is the observation that African populations exhibit the greatest genetic diversity and the largest inferred ancestral population sizes (Ne). This has been interpreted as evidence that Homo sapiens originated in Africa, on the premise that older populations should retain more genetic variation.
However, high diversity does not inherently indicate source status. In structured population systems, a region that functions as a recipient of gene flow from multiple external populations can accumulate more genetic variation over time. As studies such as Durvasula & Sankararaman (2020) have shown, African genomes contain 2–19% DNA from archaic “ghost” hominins that no longer exist. These findings suggest that Africa may have been a demographic sink as much as a source drawing in lineages from elsewhere and preserving them through repeated introgression events.