A Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) judge is condemning the agency over its “unprecedented and astonishing” defiance of a key directive related to evidence it is seeking to use in upcoming hearings on the Biden administration’s marijuana rescheduling proposal.
At issue is DEA’s insistence on digitally submitting tens of thousands of public comments it received in response to the proposed rule to move cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) as evidence in the hearings.
At multiple points, DEA Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) John Mulrooney advised the agency that hard copies of all evidence needed to be entered by January 3, and he rejected DEA’s request for an exception to the rule. Nevertheless, DEA moved to submit the comments in compact disc form despite the “clear (and repeated) directives,” the judge said in an order on Monday.
“The Government has not supplied the tribunal with a hard copy of the lengthy proposed exhibit… which it represents as containing the Comments,” Mulrooney said. “In view of the fact that Government’s request for leave for an exception to the rules applicable to the rest of the Designated Participants was specifically denied, this action is clearly not a mistake borne of misunderstanding or inadvertence, but an action taken in deliberate defiance of specific direction.”
“Even among the numerous extraordinary and puzzling actions taken thus far by the Government during the course of this litigation, this disobedience of an unequivocal directive from the tribunal is unprecedented and astonishing,” he said.
To that end, he rejected the evidentiary exhibit and further noted that, in light of DEA’s “deliberate failure to comply with the unequivocal and repeated directive of the tribunal, the issue of sanction is herein RESERVED for a determination to be made at such time during the hearing on the merits that the proposed exhibit is offered into the record.”
Hellbound and Down 