First a little context:
Adherence to the existing IHR’s with enforcement at the country, state, city and local level, resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of people around the world directly, and untold millions indirectly, via the second order effects of starvation and business failures. This genocide was paid for with trillions of dollars of debt that has been completely wasted on consuming scarce resources for all the paraphernalia and toxic injections used.
The changes to the WHO IHR now include the term “gene therapy” for treatment of pandemics.
Take a look at how the EU operates a similar system.
The European Union Commission uses “Directives” to implement the policy choices of the EU Council of Leaders which are then ratified by the EU Parliament.
The U has THREE presidents!
From here:
What are EU directives? – UK in a changing Europe (ukandeu.ac.uk)
“Directives are the most common form of EU legal act. In contrast to a regulation, a directive does not apply directly at the national level. Instead, an EU directive sets out an objective to be achieved, and it is then left to the individual countries to achieve this objective however they see fit.
This takes place through a process called ‘transposition’, which essentially translates an EU directive into national legislation.”
Pay particular attention to that last sentence.
You can compare and contrast that with mechanisms in other democracies and the second round impacts on “third” countries of compliance with the EU when engaging in trade and tourism.
Hellbound and Down 